The impact of introducing an ICF-based rehabilitation tool on staff satisfaction with multidisciplinary team care in rheumatology: An exploratory study

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-37

  Verhoef, J ^a   Toussaint, P J ^a   Putter, H ^a   Zwetsloot Schonk, J H M ^a   Vliet Vlieland, T P M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT CARE; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; REHABILITATION CENTER; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOLOGY; SATISFACTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEAMWORK; WARD; WORKLOAD;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DAY CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHEUMATOLOGY;

EID: 40549101548     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507079845     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Scott DL, Smith C, Kingsley G. What are the consequences of early rheumatoid arthritis for the individual? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 117-36.
2. Davis RM, Wagner EG, Groves T. Advances in managing chronic disease. Research, performance measurement, and quality improvement are the key. BMJ 2000; 320: 525-26.
3. Spiegel JS, Spiegel TM, Ward NB. Are rehabilitation programs for rheumatoid arthritis patients effective? Semin Arthritis Rheum 1987; 16: 260-70.
4. Vliet Vlieland TPM, Hazes JMW. Efficacy of multidisciplinary team care programs in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997; 27: 110-22.
5. Petersson IF. Evolution of team care and evaluation of effectiveness. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005; 17: 160-63.
6. Beckerman H, Roelofsen E, Knol D, Lankhorst G. The value of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) as a quality sub-system in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 387-400.
7. Monaghan J, Channell K, McDowell D, Sharma AK. Improving patient and carer communication, multidisciplinary team working and goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 194-99.
8. Yelin EH. What's inside the team care box? Is it the party, the connectiond, the attention, of the Gestalt. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 1647-48.
9. Stucki G. Understanding disability. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 289-90.
10. Stucki G, Ewert T. How to assess the impact of arthritis on the individual patient: the WHO ICF. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 664-68.
11. Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1098-107.
12. Jelles F, Van Bennekom CAM, Lankhorst GJ. Instruments to structure interdisciplinary team conferences in rehabilitation medicine: the added value of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile. J Rehabil Sci 1995; 8: 51-57.
13. Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment programme. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 497-506.
14. Schochat T, Pilz C, Neuner R. The Indicators of Rehab Status questionnaire version 3 (IRES-3) in 1818 rehabilitees with musculoskeletal diseases. Rehabilitation 2003; 42: 23644, In German.
15. Buhrlen B, Gerdes N, Jackel WH. Development and psychometric testing of a patient questionnaire for medical rehabilitation (IRES-3). Rehabilitation 2005; 44: 63-74, In German.
16. Van Bennekom CAM, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ. Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 169-75.
17. Jelles F, Van Bennekom CAM, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, Kuik DJ. Introducing an innovative method in team conferences. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 374-79.
18. Roelofsen EE, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The effects of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile for children on the quality of team conferences. In Roelofsen EE ed. The Rehabilitation Activities Profile for children. Development, implementation and evaluation. Free University Amsterdam, 2001.
19. Schuringa A. Behandeling van een patiënt met SLE volgens het Revalidatie Activiteiten Profiel (in Dutch). Ned T Reum 2001; 2: 40-45.
20. Verhoef J, Toussaint PJ, Zwetsloot-Schonk JHM, Breedveld FC, Putter H, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Effectiveness of the introduction of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based rehabilitation tool in multidisciplinary team care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 240-48.
21. Tijhuis GJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JMW, Van den Hout WB, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TPM. A randomized comparison of care provided by a clinical nurse specialist, inpatient team care and day patient team care in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 525-31.
22. Tijhuis GJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JMW, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TPM. The two-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of a clinical nurse specialist intervention, inpatient and day patient team care in rheumatoid arthritis. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41: 34-43.
23. Van den Hout WB, Tijhuis GJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JMW, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of multidisciplinary care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised comparison of clinical nurse specialist care, inpatient team care, and day patient care. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 308-15.
24. World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, 2001.
25. Halstead LS, Rintala DH, Kanellos M et al. The innovative rehabilitation team: an experiment in team building. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 357-61.
26. Moos RH, Humphrey B. Group Environment Scale. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981.
27. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Martino-Saltzmann D. The rehabilitation team: staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 177-82.
28. Jelles F, Van Bennekom CAM, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Staff satisfaction with team conferences: development of a questionnaire. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 49-57.
29. Jelles F, Van Bennekom CA, Lankhorst GJ. The interdisciplinary team conference in rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 464-65.
30. Stucki G, Cieza A, Geyh S et al. ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rehabil Med 2004; 44(suppl): 87-93.
31. Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8: R84. Available from http://arthritis-research.com/content/8/4/R84
32. Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M et al. Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the patient perspective: a qualitative study. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 431-39.
33. Smits SJ, Falconer JA, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Strasser DC. Patient-focused rehabilitation team cohesiveness in veterans administration hospitals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1332-38.