Does money matter? A theory-driven growth mixture model to explain travel-mode choice with experimental data

Methodology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 124-134

  Davidov, Eldad ^a   Yang Hansen, Kajsa ^b   Gustafsson, Jan Eric ^b   Schmidt, Peter ^a   Bamberg, Sebastian ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Growth mixture modeling; Intervention study; Latent class analysis; Mplus; STREAMS; Travel mode choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 40549091759     PISSN: 16141881     EISSN: 16142241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.3.124     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bamberg, S., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (in press). Wie gut erklären enge" oder weite" Rational-Choice-Version Verhaltensveränderungen? Ergebnisse einer experimentellen Interventionssstudie." In A. Diekmann, K. Eichner, P. Schmidt, & T. Voss (Eds.), Rational choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
2. Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2001). Theory-driven subgroup-specific evaluation of an intervention to reduce private car use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1300-1329.
3. Becker, G. S (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Curran, P. J., & Muthén, B. O. (1999). The application of latent curve analysis to testing developmental theories in intervention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 567-595.
6. Davidov, E. (in press). Explaining habits in a new context: The case of travel-mode choice. Rationality and Society.
7. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Bamberg, S. (2003) Time and money: An empirical explanation of behaviour in the context of travel-mode choice with the German microcensus. European Sociological Review, 19, 267-280.
8. Dayton, C. M. (2003). Model comparisons using information measures. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2, 281-292.
9. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahl, P. A. (2000). STREAMS user's guide: Version 2.5 for Windows. Mölndal, Goteborg: Multivariate-Ware.
10. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahl, P.A. (2001). Using Mplus with STREAMS 2.5. Goteborg: Multivariate Ware.
11. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahl, P. A. (2004a). Using Mplus with STREAMS 3.0. Goteborg: Multivariate Ware.
12. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahl, P. A. (2004b). STREAMS user's Guide: Version 3.0 for Windows. Mölndal, Goteborg: Multivariate-Ware.
13. Hagenaars, J. A. & McCutcheon, A. (Eds.) (2002) Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kühnel, S. (1999). Können Mischverteilungsmodelle das Problem heterogener Daten lösen? ZA-Information, 45, 44-70.
15. Li, F., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (2001). Piece-wise growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 175-204.
16. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika 54, 557-585.
17. Muthén, B. (2001a). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Muthén, B. (2001b). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Muthén, B. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.
20. Muthén, B., Brown, C. H., Masyn, K., Jo, B.,Khoo, S.-T., Yang, C.-C., Wang, C.-P., Kellam, S. G., Carlin, J. B., & Liao, J. (2002). General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics, 3, 459-475.
21. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 42, 431-462.
22. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analysis: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.
23. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2001). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
24. Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (2003). Mplus version 2.13. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
25. Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469.
26. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
27. Opp, K.-D. (1999). Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 171-202.
28. Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.