Business process visualization - Use cases, challenges, solutions

ICEIS 2006 - 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings

Volumn ISAS, Issue , 2006, Pages 204-211

  Rinderle, Stefanie ^a   Bobrik, Ralph ^a   Reichert, Manfred ^b   Bauer, Thomas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Business processes visualization

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE PROCESS; BROAD SPECTRUM; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS VISUALIZATION; BUSINESS PROCESSES VISUALIZATION; DIFFERENT PROCESS; GENERAL GRAPH; GRAPH LAYOUT; HIGH-LEVEL PETRI NETS; META MODEL; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS; RUNNING PROCESS;

DRAWING (GRAPHICS); GRAPH THEORY; PETRI NETS; VISUALIZATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 40549090779     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., and Bauer, T. (2005). Requirements for the visualization of system-spanning business processes. In DEXA'05, pages 948-954.
2. Brandes, U. and Köpf, B. (2002). Fast and simple horizontal coordinate assignment. In GD01.
3. de Fraysseix, H., Pach, J., and Pollack, R. (1988). Small sets supporting fary embeddings of planar graphs. In STOC'88, pages 426-433.
4. Diguglielmo, G., Durocher, E., Kaplan, P., Sander, G., and Vasiliu, A. (2002). Graph layout for workflow applications with ILOG jViews. In Proc. GD02.
5. Eades, P., Lin, T., and Lin, X. (1993). Two tree drawing conventions. Computional Geometry & Applications, 3(2):133-153.
6. Fleischer, R. and Hirsch, C. (2001). Graph drawing and its applications. In Grawing Graphs: Methods and Models, pages 1-21.
7. Frick, A., Ludwig, A., and Mehldau, H. (1994). A fast adaptive layout algorithm for undirected graphs. In GD94.
8. Fruchterman, T. and Reingold, E. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software Practice and Experience, 21(11):1129-1164.
9. Hong, S., Eades, P., Quigley, A., and Lee, S. (1998). Drawing algorithms for series-parallel digraphs in two and three dimensions. In Proc. GD98, pages 198-209.
10. Kikusts, P. and Rucevskis, P. (1995). Layout algorithms of graph-like diagrams for GRADE windows graphic editors. In Proc. GD95, pages 361-364.
11. Liu, D. and Shen, M. (2003). Workflow modeling for virtual processes: An order-preserving process-view approach. Information Systems, 28(6):505-532.
12. Purchase, H. (2002). Metrics for graph drawing aesthetics. Visual Languages and Computing, 13:501-516.
13. Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. (1998). ADEPTflex - supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. JIIS, 10(2):93-129.
14. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P. (2004). Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems. DPD, 16(1):91-116.
15. Sadiq, W. and Orlowska, M. (2000). Analyzing process models using graph reduction techniques. Information Systems, 25(2):117-134.
16. Schönhage, B., van Ballegooij, A., and Elliens, A. (2000). 3D gadgets for business process visualization - a case study. In Web3D - VRML 2000, pages 131-138.
17. Six, J. and Tollis, I. (2002). Automated visualization of process diagrams. In Proc. GD01, pages 45-59.
18. Sugiyama, K. (2002). Graph Drawing and Applications for Software and Knowledge Engineering. Series on Software Eng. & Knowledge Eng. World Scientific.
19. Wittenburg, K. and Weitzman, L. (1996a). Process visualization in ShowBiz. In Proc. GD96.
20. Wittenburg, K. andWeitzman, L. (1996b). Relational grammars: Theory and practice in a visual language interface for process modeling. In In Proc. Workshop on Theory of Visual Languages, Gubbio, Italy.
21. Yang, Y., Lai, W., Shen, J., Huang, X., J.Yan, and Setiawa, L. (2004). Effective visualisation of workflow enactment. In APWeb'04, pages 794-803.