Gene prediction: Compare and CONTRAST

Genome Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2007, Pages

  Flicek, Paul ^a  

^a EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOMICS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MACHINE LEARNING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENOME; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENOME; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 40449129781     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-12-233     Document Type: Short Survey

References (19)

1. Gross SS Do CB Sirota M Batzoglou S CONTRAST: A discriminative, phylogeny-free approach to multiple informant de novo gene prediction. Genome Biol 2007, 8:r269.
2. Brent MR Genome annotation past, present, and future: How to define an ORF at each locus. Genome Res 2005, 15:1777-1786. 10.1101/gr.3866105 16339376
3. Burge C Karlin S Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol 1997, 268:78-94. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 9149143
4. Flicek P Keibler E Hu P Korf I Brent MR Leveraging the mouse genome for gene prediction in human: From whole-genome shotgun reads to a global synteny map. Genome Res 2003, 13:46-54. 430948 12529305 10.1101/gr.830003
5. Guigó R Flicek P Abril JF Reymond A Lagarde J Denoeud F Antonarakis S Ashburner M Bajic VB Birney E et al. EGASP: The human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project. Genome Biol 2006, 7 Suppl 1:S2. 1810551 16925836 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s2
6. Kuhn RM Karolchik D Zweig AS Trumbower H Thomas DJ Thakkapallayil A Sugnet CW Stanke M Smith KE Siepel A et al The UCSC genome browser database: Update 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:D668-D673. 1669757 17142222 10.1093/nar/gkl928
7. Flicek P Aken BL Beal K Ballester B Caccamo M Chen Y Clarke L Coates G Cunningham F Cutts T et al Ensembl 2008. Nucleic Acids Res 2007. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm988.
8. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002, 420:520-562. 10.1038/ nature01262 12466850
9. Korf I Flicek P Duan D Brent MR Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2001, 17 Suppl 1:S140-S148. 11473003
10. Gross SS Brent MR Using multiple alignments to improve gene prediction. J Comput Biol 2006, 13:379-393. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.379 16597247
11. Curwen V Eyras E Andrews TD Clarke L Mongin E Searle SM Clamp M The Ensembl automatic gene annotation system. Genome Res 2004, 14:942-950. 479124 15123590 10.1101/gr.1858004
12. Hsu F Kent WJ Clawson H Kuhn RM Diekhans M Haussler D The UCSC known genes. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1036-1046. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl048 16500937
13. Goodstadt L Ponting CP Phylogenetic reconstruction of orthology, paralogy, and conserved synteny for dog and human. PLos Comput Biol 2006, 2:e133. 1584324 17009864 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020133
14. Consensus CDS http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CCDS
15. Noble WS What is a support vector machine? Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:1565-1567. 10.1038/nbt1206-1565 17160063
16. Siepel A Haussler D Combining phylogenetic and hidden Markov models in biosequence analysis. J Comput Biol 2004, 11:413-428. 10.1089/ 1066527041410472 15285899
17. CONTRAST http://contra.stanford.edu/contrast
18. Bernal A Crammer K Hatzigeorgiou A Pereira F Global discriminative learning for higher-accuracy computational gene prediction. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e54. 1828702 17367206 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030054
19. Decaprio D Vinson JP Pearson MD Montgomery P Doherty M Galagan JE Conrad: Gene prediction using conditional random fields. Genome Res 2007, 17:1389-1398. 1950907 17690204 10.1101/gr.6558107