|
Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2007, Pages
|
Comparison of different commercial kits for HER2 testing in breast cancer: looking for the accurate cutoff for amplification.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CHROMOGENIC SUBSTRATE;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2;
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT;
ARTICLE;
BREAST TUMOR;
CANCER INVASION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY;
FEMALE;
FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION;
GENE AMPLIFICATION;
GENETICS;
HUMAN;
METABOLISM;
METHODOLOGY;
PROGNOSIS;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CHROMOGENIC COMPOUNDS;
FEMALE;
GENE AMPLIFICATION;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOENZYME TECHNIQUES;
IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE;
NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS;
PROGNOSIS;
REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC;
RECEPTOR, ERBB-2;
|
EID: 40449103809
PISSN: None
EISSN: 1465542X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1770 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (41)
|
References (0)
|