'Do not resuscitate order' in neonatology: Authority rules

Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 58, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2007, Pages 485-492

  Niebroj L T ^a   Jadamus Niebroj D ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b Silesian Medical Academy Upper Silesian Child and Mother's Center of Health   (Poland)

Author keywords

Authority rules; Do not resuscitate order; Newborns; Principlism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEWBORN CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESUSCITATION;

HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; NEONATOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESUSCITATION ORDERS;

EID: 40449094673     PISSN: 08675910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Callahan D. Principlism and communitarianism. J Med Ethics 2003; 29:287-291.
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford/New York/Toronto,Oxford University Press, 1994.
3. Evans JH. A sociological account of the growth of principlism. Hasting Cent Rep 2000; 30:31-38.
4. Cuttini M, Kaminski M, Saracci R, Vonderweid de U. The EURONIC Project: A European concerted action on information to parents and ethical decision-making in neonatal intensive care, 1997; 11:461-474.
5. Sauer PJ. Ethical dilemmas in neonatology: recommendation of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160:364-368.
6. Young EW, Stevenson DK. Limiting treatment for extremely premature, low-birth-weight infants (500-750 g). Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:549-552.
7. Desfrere L, Tsatsaris V, Sanchez L, Cabrol D, Moirette G. Critères de reanimation des prématurisimes en sale de naissance; quel discourse en antenatal? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2004; (1 Suppl):S84-S87.
8. Schulz-Blades A, Huseman D, Loui A, Dudenhausen JW, Obladen M. Neonatal end-of-life practice in German perinatal centre. Acta Paediatrica 2007; 96:681-687.
9. Sirkka-Liisa H. Pain management in nursing procedures on premature babies, J Adv Nurs 2003; 42:587-597.
10. Bucher HU. Ethische Probleme bei extreme unreifen Frühgeborenen. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2004; 44:25-30.
11. Harrison D, Johnston L, Loughan P. Oral sucrose for procedural pain in sick hospitalized infants: A randomized-controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health 2003; 39:591-597.
12. Peabody JL, Martin GI. From how small is too small to how much is too much. Ethical issues at the limits of neonatal viability. Clin Perinatol 1996; 13:473-489.
13. Dodds E. Neonatal procedural pain: a survey of nursing staff. Paediatr Nurs 2003; 15:18-21.
14. Marceau J. Pilot study of a pain assessment tool in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Paediatr Child Health 2003; 39:598-601.
15. Stevens B, Yamada J, Beyene J et al. Consistent management of repeated procedural pain with sucrose in preterm neonates: Its effective and safe for repeated use over time? Clin J Pain 2005; 21:543-548.
16. Anand KJ, Aranda JV, Berde CB et al. Summary proceedings from the neonatal pain-control group. Pediatrics 2006; (3Pt2):S9-S22.
17. Goldworth A. Human rights and the omission or cessation of treatment for infants. J Perinatol 1989; 9:79-82.
18. Gibbins S, Stevens B, Asztalos E. Assessment and management of acute pain in high-risk neonates. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2003; 4:475-483.
19. Mitchell A, Boss BJ. Adverse effects of pain on the nervous system of newborns and young children: a review of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs 2002: 34:228-236.
20. Tejedor Torres JC, Aybar Gracia L. Toma de decisions eticas y limitacion del soporte vital en recien nacidos criticos. Ann Esp Pediatr 1997; 46:53-59.
21. Wilson MA, Terminating Life Support. Who Decides When It's Okay? AWHONN Lifelines 1997; 53-56.
22. Niebrój L. Defining health/illness: societal and/or clinical medicine. J Physiol Pharmacol 2006; 57(Supp 4):251-262.