Possible realization of entanglement, logical gates, and quantum-information transfer with superconducting-quantum-interference-device qubits in cavity QED

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 423111-423118

  Yang, Chui Ping ^a,b   Chu, Shih I ^a,b   Han, Siyuan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Kansas Ctr for Adv Sci Computing   (United States)

^c University of Kansas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMILTONIANS; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; LOGIC GATES; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

QUANTUM-INFORMATION TRANSFER;

SQUIDS;

EID: 4043178882     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. J.E. Mooij, T.P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C.H. van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, Science 285, 1036 (1999).
2. C.H. van der Wal, A.C.J. ter Haar, F.K. Wilhelm, R.N. Schouten, C.J.P.M. Harmans, T.P. Orlando, S. Lloyd, and J.E. Mooij, Science 290, 773 (2000).
3. T.P. Orlando, J.E. Mooij, L. Tian, C.H. van der Wal, L. Levitov, S. Lloyd, and J.J. Mazo, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 398 (1999).
4. A. Shnirman, G. Schön, and Z. Hermon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997).
5. A. Blais and A.M. Zagoskin, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042308 (2000).
6. A. Steinbach, P. Joyez, A. Cottet, D. Esteve, M.H. Devoret, M.E. Huber, and J.M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137003 (2001).
7. J.M. Martinis and R.L. Kautz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1507 (1989).
8. Y. Makhlin, G. Schoen, and A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001).
9. Y. Makhlin, G. Schoen, and A. Shnirman, Nature (London) 398, 305 (1999).
10. Y. Nakamura, Y. Pashkin, and J.S. Tsai, Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
11. W. Xiang-bin and M. Keiji, Phys. Rev. B 65, 172508 (2002).
12. W. Xiang-bin and M. Keiji, e-print quant-ph/0105008.
13. J.R. Friedman, V. Patel, W. Chen, S.K. Tolpygo, and J.E. Lukens, Nature (London) 406, 43 (2000).
14. X. Zhou, J.L. Habif, M.F. Bocko, and M.J. Feldman, e-print quant-ph/0102090.
15. Z. Zhou, Shih-I Chu, and S. Han, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054527 (2002).
16. P. Silvestrini and L. Stodolsky, e-print cond-mat/0004472.
17. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
18. T. Sleator and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4087 (1995).
19. M. Brune, S. Haroche, J.M. Raimond, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. A 45, 5193 (1992).
20. Q.A. Turchette, C.J. Hood, W. Lange, H. Mabuchi, and H.J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
21. M.F. Bocko, A.M. Herr, and M.J. Feldman, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 3638 (1997).
22. R. C. Rey-de-Castro, M.F. Bocko, A.M. Herr, C.A. Mancini, and M.J. Feldman, e-print quant-ph/0102089.
23. M. Crogan, S. Khlebnikov, and G. Sadiek, e-print quant-ph/0105038.
24. Y. Yu, S. Han, X. Chu, S.-I. Chu, and Z. Wang, Science 296, 889 (2002).
25. D. Vion, A. Aassime, A. Cottet, P. Joyez, H. Pothier, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M. Devoret, Science 296, 886 (2002).
26. J.M. Kikkawa and D.D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4313 (1998).
27. A. Imamoglu, D.D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).
28. E. Pazy, E. Biolatti, T. Calarco, I. D'Amico, P. Zanardi, F. Rossi, and P. Zoller, e-print cond-mat/0109337.
29. M. Bayer and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. B 65, 041308(R) (2002).
30. E. Biolatti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5647 (2000); Phys. Rev. B 65, 075306 (2002).
31. E. Biolatti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5647 (2000); Phys. Rev. B 65, 075306 (2002).
32. S. Han, R. Rouse, and J.E. Lukens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3404 (1996).
33. T.P. Spiller, T.D. Clark, R.J. Prance, and A. Widom, Prog. Low Temp. Phys. 13, 219 (1992).
34. S.B. Zheng and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 63, 044302 (2001). Zheng and Guo addressed how to realize quantum entanglement and the controlled-NOT logical gate using atoms with a Σ-type three-level or a two-level configuration in cavity QED. In our scheme, we instead use the Σ-type three-level configuration because it is rather difficult to utilize the Σ-type level structure with SQUIDs.
35. S.B. Zheng and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 63, 044302 (2001). Zheng and Guo addressed how to realize quantum entanglement and the controlled-NOT logical gate using atoms with a Σ-type three-level or a two-level configuration in cavity QED. In our scheme, we instead use the Σ-type three-level configuration because it is rather difficult to utilize the Σ-type level structure with SQUIDs.
36. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999).
37. J.S. Bell, Physics (Long Island, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965).
38. A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
39. D. Deutsch and R. Jozsa, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 439, 553 (1992).
40. C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, G. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
41. V. Buzek and M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996).
42. J.W. Pan, M. Daniell, S. Gasparoni, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001).
43. C.A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C.J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q.A. Turchette, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 404, 256 (2000).
44. E. Hagley, X. Maitre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997); S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, ibid. 87, 037902 (2001).
45. E. Hagley, X. Maitre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997); S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, ibid. 87, 037902 (2001).
46. L.X. Li and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 60, 696 (1999).
47. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
48. G. Brassard, S.L. Braunstein, and R. Cleve, Physica D 120, 43 (1998).
49. M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4887 (1996).