Institutional repositories: Towards the identification of critical success factors

Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 89-108

  Shearer, M Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043164891     PISSN: 1195096X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Arunachalam, S. 2000. Information for research in developing countries - Information Technology, a friend or foe? Available: http://www.dgroups.org/ groups/iNARS/docs/arun2.doc
2. Baldwin, C. 1998. SuperJournal update. Ariadne 14. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue14/superjournal/
3. Bishop, A.P. 1998. Logins and bailouts: Measuring access, use, and success in digital libraries. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 4(2). Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html
4. Bishop, A. P. S. L. Star, L. Neumann, E. Ignacio, R. J. Sandusky, and B. Schatz. 1996. Building a university digital library: Understanding implications for academic institutions and their constituencies in higher education and the Nll: From vision to reality. Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: EDUCOM, 45-53.
5. Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002. FAQs. Available: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm
6. Carr, L. S. Hitchcock, W. Hall, and S. Harnad. 2000. A usage based analysis of CoRR. A commentary on "CoRR: a Computing Research Repository" by Joseph Y. Halpern. Available: http://xxx.lanl.gov/html/cs/ 0009004
7. Christensen, E.W. and J.R. Bailey. 2000. Repository choice: An exploration of accessibility, satisfaction and usefulness. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000. Available: http://www.computer.org/proceedings/hicss/0493/04936/04936041.pdf
8. Crow, R. 2002a.The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. Washington, DC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Available: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
9. _. 2002b. SPARC Institutional Repository checklist & resource guide. Washington, DC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Available: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html
10. The DSpace Project. 2000. MIT Faculty Newsletter 12(4). Available: http://dspace.org/news/dspace-project.html
11. Ginsparg, R 2000. Creating a global knowledge network. Editorial, Freedom of Information Conference, 2000. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/ meetings/2000/foi/editorials/ginsparg
12. _. 1996. Scientists' view of electronic publishing and issues raised. Electronic publishing in science conference proceedings, UNESCO HQ, Paris, 19-23 Feb 1996. Available: http://arxiv.org/blurb/pg96unesco.html#current
13. Hitchcock, S. 2003. Metalist of open access eprint archives: The genesis of institutional archives and independent services. The Open Citation Project. Available: http://opcit.eprints.org/explorearchives.shtml
14. Lawal, I. 2002. Scholarly Communication: The Use and Non-Use of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Fall 2002. Available: http://www.istl.org/02-fall/ article3.html
15. Luce, R. E. 2001. E-prints intersect the digital library: Inside the Los Alamos arXiv. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Winter 2001. Available: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/01-winter/article3.html
16. Kritchel, T. and S. Warner. 2001. Disintermediation of academic publishing through the Internet: An intermediate report from the front line. Available: http://openlib.org/home/krichel/sants.html
17. McMillan, G. 1999. The evolving genre of electronic theses and dissertations. The 32nd Hawaii international conference of systems science, 1999. Available: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/presentations/Hawaii/ ETDgenreALL.pdf
18. Nixon, W. J. 2002. The evolution of an institutional e-prints archive at the University of Glasgow. Ariadne 32. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/ issue32/eprint-archives/intro.html
19. Odlyzlco, A. 2000. The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Available: http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/odlyzko.pdf
20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2002 OECD follow up group on issues of access to publicly funded research data: Interim report. Available: http://dataaccess.ucsd.edu/Final_Interim_Report_200ct2002.doc
21. Pinfield, S. 2001. How do physicists use an E-Print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Li'b Magazine 7(12). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html
22. Sherpa. 2003. Partners. Available: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/partners.html
23. Surf. 2003. Digital academic repositories. Available: http://www.surf.nl/en/themas/index2.php?oid=7