Spatial distribution and habitat use of the western pearlshell mussel (margaritifera falcata) in a western washington stream

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 341-352

  Stone, Jen ^a   Barndt, Scott ^b   Gangloff, Michael ^c  

^a US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT USE; MOLLUSC; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; STREAM;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

BIVALVIA; MARGARITIFERA FALCATA; MARGARITIFERIDAE; MOLLUSCA;

EID: 4043156249     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2004.9664907     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allan, J. D., 1995. Stream ecology:structure and function of running waters 388New York:Chapman and Hall.
2. Bauer, G., 1987. Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Journal of Animal Ecology., 56:691–704.
3. Bauer, G., Hochwald, S., and Silkenat, W., 1991. Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels:the role of host fish and metabolic rate. Freshwater Biology., 26:377–386.
4. Bauer, G. S., 1992. Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. Journal of Animal Ecology., 61:425–436.
5. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E., 1980. Regression diagnostics:Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity New York:John Wiley and Sons.
6. Dewey, W. F., 2000. The various relationships between shellfish and water quality. Journal of Shellfish Research., 19 (1):656
7. nd edition. Scientific Publications of the Freshwater Biological Association No. 25
8. Frest, T. J., and Johannes, E. J., 1995. Interior Columbia Basin mollusk species of concern. Final report to the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Walla Walla, WA. Contract W43-OE00- 4–9122. 274 pp plus appendices
9. Gittings, T., O'Keefe, D., Gallagher, F., Finn, J., and O'Mahony, T., 1998. Longitudinal variation in abundance of a freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera population in relation to riverine habitats. Biology and Environment:Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 98B (3):171–178.
10. Gregory, S. V., and Bisson, P. A., 1997. “ Degradation and loss of anadromous salmonid habitat in the Pacific Northwest ”. In Pacific salmon and their ecosystems:status and future options Edited by:Stouder, D. J., Bisson, P. A., and Naiman, R. J., 277–314. New York:Chapman and Hall.
11. Hastie, L., Boon, C. P. J., and Young, M. R., 2000. Physical microhabitat requirements of freshwater pearl mussels, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Hydrobiologia., 429:59–71.
12. Hardison, B. S., and Layzer, J. B., 2001. Relationships between complex hydraulics and the localized distribution of mussels in three regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 17:77–84.
13. Havlik, M. E., and Marking, L. L., 1987. Effects of contaminants on naiad mollusks (Unionidae):A review. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. Resource Publication 164. Washington D.C.
14. Hendelberg, J., 1961. The freshwater pearl mussel Margarigifera margaritifera (L.), Report of the Institute of Freshwater Research. Drottingholm, 41:1394–1399.
15. Imlay, M., 1982. Use of shells of freshwater musels in monitoring heavy metals and environmental stresses:A review. Malacological Review., 15:1–14.
16. Johnson, P. D., and Brown, K. M., 1998. Intraspecific life history variation in the threatened Louisiana pearlshell mussel, Margaritifera hembeli. Freshwater Biology, 40:317–329.
17. Johnson, P. D., and Brown, K. M., 2000. The importance of microhabitat factors and habitat stability to the threatened Lousiana pearl shell, Margaritifera hembeli (Conrad). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78:271–277.
18. Morris, T. J., and Corkum, L. D., 1996. Assemblage structure of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) in rivers with grassy and forested riparian zones. Journal of the North American Benthological Society:, 15 (4) 576–586
19. Nagelkerke, N. J.D., 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78:691–692.
20. Parmalee, P. W., and Klippel, W. E., 1974. Freshwater mussels as a prehistoric food resource. American Antiquity., 39 (3):421–434.
21. Roscoe, E. J., and Redelings, S., 1964. The ecology of the fresh-water pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Sterkiana., 16:19–32.
22. Platts, W. S., 1987. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. U. S. Forest Service. General Technical Report INT, 221:58–60.
23. Roscoe, E. J., and Redelings, S., 1964. The ecology of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Sterkiana, 16:19–32.
24. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 8, Volumes 1 and 2 1675Cary, NC:SAS Institute, Inc.
25. Sokal, A., and Rohlf, F. J., 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition 859New York:W. H. Freeman and Company.
26. Smith, D. G., 2001. “ Systematics and distribution of the recent Margaritiferidae ”. In Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionioda. Ecological Studies, volume 145. Verlag-Springer, Berlin. Edited by:Bauer, G., and Wachtler, K., 33–49.
27. Statzner, B., Gore, J. A., and Resh, V. H., 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology:observed patterns and potential applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7 (4):307–360.
28. Stober, Q. J., 1972. Disbribution and age of Margaritifera margaritifera (L.)in a Madison River (Montana, USA) mussel bed. Malacologia, 1l (2):343–350.
29. SYSTAT. 2002. Version 10.2.01 Richmond, CA
30. Taylor, D. W., 1981. Freshwater mollusks of California:a distributional checklist. California Fish & Game., 67 (3):140–163.
31. Toy, K. A., 1998. Growth, reproduction and habitat preference of the freshwater mussel Margaritifera margaritifera falcata in western Washington. MS Thesis, University of Washington. 84
32. Turick, C., Sexstone, C. A. J., and Bissonnette, G. K., 1988. Freshwater mussels as monitors of bacteriological water quality. Water, Air, Soil Pollution., 40:449–460.
33. Tyrrell, M., and Hornbach, D. J., 1998. Selective predation by muskrats on freshwater mussels in two Minnesota Rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society., 17 (3):301–310.
34. Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., and Cushing, C. E., 1980. The river continuum concept. The Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37:130–137.
35. Vannote, R. L., and Minshall, G. W., 1982. Fluvial processes and local lithology controlling abundance, structure, and composition of mussel beds. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science, USA., 79:4103–4107.
36. Watters, G. T., 1994. An annotated bibliography of the reproduction and propogation of the Unionoidea. Miscellaneous Contributions 1. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus.
37. Wellman, G., 1943. Fischinfektion mit Glochidien der Margaritifera margaritifera. Z-Fischerei., 41:358–390.
38. Wentworth, C. K., 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology, 30:377–392.
39. Williams, J. D., Warren, M. L., Jr., Cummings, K. S., Hanis, J. L., and Neves, R. J., 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United Statesand Canada. Fisheries., 18:6–22.
40. Young, M. R., and Williams, J. C., 1983. Redistribution and local recolonisation by the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Journal of Conch?, 31:225–234.
41. Young, M. R., Cosgrove, P. J., Hastie, L. C., and Henniger, B., 2001. A standardised method for assessing the status of freshwater mussels in clear, shallow rivers. Journal of Mollusk Studies., 67:395–405.