The implementation and evaluation of a community rehabilitation team: A case study

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 817-826

  Ryan Woolley, Bernadette ^a   Wilson, Kate ^a   Caress, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CASE STUDY; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSULTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; REHABILITATION CENTERS;

EID: 4043152902     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280410001696737     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Warden J. Government gives NHS £250m for UK winter health pressures. British Medical Journal 1998; 317: 1338.
2. Steiner A. Intermediate Care: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature. The King's Fund, London 1997.
3. Hyde CJ, Robert IE, Sinclair AJ. The effects of supporting discharge from hospital to home in older people. Age and Ageing 2000; 29: 271-279.
4. Shepperd S, Illiffe S. Hospital-at-Home Versus In-Patient Hospital Care (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Update Software, Oxford, 1999.
5. Steiner A, Vaughan B, Hanford L. Intermediate Care: Approaches to Evaluation. The King's Fund, London 1998.
6. Shield F. Developing a therapy-led community rehabilitation team. Managing Community Care 1998: 6(4): 160-168.
7. Luker K, Waters K, Austin L, Griffiths J, Gosden T. An Evaluation of the South Manchester Community Rehabilitation Pilot Project. Unpublished report, The University of Manchester, 1999.
8. Sinclair A, Dickinson E. Effective Practice in Rehabilitation: The Evidence of Systematic Reviews. The King's Fund, London 1998.
9. Nocon A, Baldwin S. Trends in Rehabilitation Policy: A Review of the Literature. The King's Fund, London 1998.
10. Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 1385-1388.
11. Stern T. Commissioning rehabilitation services in primary care. Managing Community Care 1998; 6(4): 154-159.
12. Trappes-Lomax T. Messages from the front line: joint health and social care rehabilitation. Managing Community Care 1999; 7(4): 33-37.
13. Le Mesurier N, Cumella S. Enhancing independence: the effectiveness of re-ablement provision in South Worcestershire. Managing Community Care 1999; 7(4): 27-32.
14. Robinson J. Rehabilitation. Managing Community Care 1999; 7(4): 39-44.
15. Kendall E, Buys N, Larner J. Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22(10): 435-445.
16. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 1st edn. California: Sage, 1984.
17. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage, 1998.
18. Grbich C. Qualitative Research in Health. London: Sage, 1999.
19. Miles MB. Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 1994.
20. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Improving Access to Cost Effectiveness for Health Care Decision Making: the NHS Economic Evaluation Database. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, York 2001.
21. Enderby P, Wade DT. Community rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15:577 581.
22. Hartley S. Commentary on 'community based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox' by Kendall, Buys and Larner. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23(1): 26-29.
23. Lewis H, Wistow G. Breaking the cycle. Community Care 1996: 5-11 December: ii-iv.
24. Grieg R, Poxton R. Nice process - but did joint commissioning change anyone's life? Managing Community Care 2001: 9(2): 16-21.
25. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People, Standard Three: Intermediate Care. London: Department of Health, 2001.
26. Department of Health. Special Grant Report on the Promoting Independence: Partnership Grant for 1999/2000. London: Department of Health, 1999.
27. Eldar R. A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22(4): 163-169.
28. Reed J, Pearson P, Douglas B, Swinburne S, Wilding H. Going home from hospital - an appreciative inquiry study. Health and Social Care in the Community 2002; 10(1): 36-45.
29. Scholes J, Vaughan B. Cross-boundary working: implications for the multiprofessional team. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2002; 11: 399-408.
30. Kassah AK. Commentary on: Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23(1): 18-21.
31. Bowling A. Research Methods in Health. 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
32. Skeet M. Home from Hospital: The Result of a Survey Conducted Among Recently Discharged Hospital Patients. London: Macmillan Journals, 1970.
33. Brown K, Gillespie D. Recovering relationships: a feminist analysis of recovery models. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992; 46(11): 1001-1005.
34. Department of Health. Intermediate Care. Health Service Circular/Local Authority Circular HSC 2001/01:LAC (2001)1. London: Department of Health, 2001.
35. Campbell H, Karnon J, Dowie R. Cost analysis of a hospital-at-home initiative using discrete event simulation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2001; 6(1): 14-22.
36. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 1994; 16:103-121.
37. Wilson K, Roe B. Interviewing older people by telephone following initial contact by postal survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998; 27: 575-581.
38. Wilson K, Roe B, Wright L. Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 1998; 35: 314-321.