Testing whether any of the significant tests within a table are indeed significant

Oikos

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 409-410

  Neuhäuser, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TESTING METHOD;

EID: 4043143609     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13246.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. - J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57: 289-300.
2. Fisher, R. A. 1932. Statistical methods for research workers. - Oliver and Boyd, London.
3. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. - Scand. J. Stat. 6: 65-70.
4. Moran, M. D. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. - Oikos 100: 403-405.
5. Pigeot, I. 2000. Basic concepts of multiple tests - a survey. - Statist. Papers 41: 3-36.
6. Rice, W. R. 1990. A consensus combined P-value test and the family-wide significance of component tests. - Biometrics 46: 303-308.
7. Ryman, N. and Jorde, P. E. 2001. Statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation. - Mol. Ecol. 10: 2361-2373.
8. Simes, R. J. 1986. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. - Biometrika 73: 751-754.
9. Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. 1993. Resampling-based multiple testing: examples and methods for P-value adjustment. - Wiley.
10. Zaykin, D. V., Zhivotovsky, L. A., Westfall, P. H. et al. 2002. Truncated product method for combining P-values. - Genet. Epidemiol. 22: 170-185.