Angle-resolved photoemission from surface states

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Krasovskii, E E ^a   Schattke, W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b DONOSTIA INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CENTER DIPC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; BAND STRUCTURE; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; CRYSTAL SYMMETRY; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; FUNCTIONS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LOW ENERGY ELECTRON DIFFRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PHOTOEMISSION; PHOTONS; THERMAL DIFFUSION;

AB INITO CALCULATIONS; SPECTRAL DENSITY; SURFACE POTENTIAL BARRIER; SURFACE STATES;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 4043143418     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.027601     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. N. Memmel, Surf. Sci. Rep. 32, 93 (1998).
2. S. G. Louie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 549 (1980).
3. S. D. Kevan, N. G. Stoffel, and N. V. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 31, 1788 (1985).
4. See the discussion of final states effects in PE from Bi2212: A. Bansil and M. Lindroos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5154 (1999); H. M. Fretwell et al., ibid. 84, 4449 (2000).
5. See the discussion of final states effects in PE from Bi2212: A. Bansil and M. Lindroos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5154 (1999); H. M. Fretwell et al., ibid. 84, 4449 (2000).
6. P. J. Feibelman and D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4932 (1974).
7. E. E. Krasovskii and W. Schattke, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12874 (1997).
8. γ) = 1 to γ(0) = 0. See E. E. Krasovskii and W. Schattke, Phys. Rev. B 60, 16 251 (1999), and Ref. [17] therein.
9. E. Caruthers, L. Kleinman, and G. P. Alldredge, Phys. Rev. B 8, 4570 (1973); D. Spanjaard, D. W. Jepsen, and P. M. Marcus, ibid. 19, 642 (1979); E. Inglesfield and G. A. Benesh, ibid. 37, 6682 (1988); E. V. Chulkov and V. M. Silkin, Surf. Sci. 215, 358 (1989).
10. E. Caruthers, L. Kleinman, and G. P. Alldredge, Phys. Rev. B 8, 4570 (1973); D. Spanjaard, D. W. Jepsen, and P. M. Marcus, ibid. 19, 642 (1979); E. Inglesfield and G. A. Benesh, ibid. 37, 6682 (1988); E. V. Chulkov and V. M. Silkin, Surf. Sci. 215, 358 (1989).
11. E. Caruthers, L. Kleinman, and G. P. Alldredge, Phys. Rev. B 8, 4570 (1973); D. Spanjaard, D. W. Jepsen, and P. M. Marcus, ibid. 19, 642 (1979); E. Inglesfield and G. A. Benesh, ibid. 37, 6682 (1988); E. V. Chulkov and V. M. Silkin, Surf. Sci. 215, 358 (1989).
12. E. Caruthers, L. Kleinman, and G. P. Alldredge, Phys. Rev. B 8, 4570 (1973); D. Spanjaard, D. W. Jepsen, and P. M. Marcus, ibid. 19, 642 (1979); E. Inglesfield and G. A. Benesh, ibid. 37, 6682 (1988); E. V. Chulkov and V. M. Silkin, Surf. Sci. 215, 358 (1989).
13. H. J. Levinson, F. Greuter, and E. W. Hummer, Phys. Rev. B 27, 727 (1983).
14. Ph. Hofmann et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 245422 (2002).
15. E. E. Krasovskii and W. Schattke, Phys. Rev. B 59, 15 609 (1999).
16. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 51, 840 (1937).
17. The variational ansatz for the half space of constant potential is described in Ref. [11].
18. See Eqs. (43) and (45) in Ref. [6].
19. M in Fig. 1). This is justified for extended states because the dominant contribution to the matrix element comes from the bulk.