Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict

Reading and Writing

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 187-218

  Kim, Jeesun ^a   Taft, Marcus ^b   Davis, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Homophones; Lexical processing; Orthography; Phonology; Sublexical processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043140726     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/b:read.0000013805.77364.cd     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Balota, D.A., Pilotti, M. & Cortese, M.J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory and Cognition, 29, 639-647.
2. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R.S. & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the connection between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
3. Bowey, J.A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional reading units. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427.
4. Burani, C., Salmaso, D. & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 18, 342-352.
5. Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
6. Coltheart, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K.E. Patterson & J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 197-226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T. & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
10. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
11. Drews, E. & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
12. Fowler, C.A., Napps, S.E. & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations between regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241-255.
13. Glushko, R.J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 674-691.
14. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1984). Resolving twenty years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
15. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.
16. Humphreys, G.W. & Evett, L.S. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740.
17. Kay, J. & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the boy in question: Further dissection of the processes of sublexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. McCann, R.S., Besner, D. & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 14, 693-706.
19. McClelland, J.L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
21. Paap, K.R. & Noel, R.W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse to race. Psychological Research, 15, 13-24.
22. Paap, K.R., McDonald, J.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W. & Noel, R.W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221-243). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Paap, K., Noel, R. & Johansen, L. (1992). Dual route models of print to sound: Red herrings and real horses. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, morphology, and meaning. Advances in psychology (pp. 293-318). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Pillon, A. (1998). The pseudoprefixation effect in visual word recognition: A true - Neither strategic nor orthographic-morphemic effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 85-120.
25. Plaut, D.C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 767-808.
26. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K.E. (1996). Understanding normal and disordered reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
27. Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & Tyler, L.K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 507-537.
28. Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
29. Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
30. Stolz, J.A. & Besner, D. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1642-1655.
31. Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street - feed-forward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
32. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
33. Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20, 289-297.
34. Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Memory and Cognition, 10, 465-474.
35. Taft, M. (1984). Evidence for an abstract lexical representation of word structure. Memory and Cognition, 12, 264-269.
36. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
38. Taft, M. & Chen, H.C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: The influence of tones. In H.C. Chen & O.J.L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 151-172). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
39. Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, 638-647.
40. Taft, M. & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320-335.
41. Taft, M. & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
42. Taft, M. & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: a Chinese study. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Taft, M., Liu, Y. & Zhu, X. (1999). Morphemic processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 91-113). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Taraban, R. & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
45. Treiman, R. & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset-and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 281-298). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
47. Treiman, R., Goswami, U. & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559-567.
48. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & Richmond-Welty, E. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.