|
|
Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 701-704
|
|
A comparison of open and percutaneous techniques in the surgical treatment of tennis elbow
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARM DISEASE;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HAND DISEASE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
JOB PERFORMANCE;
MALE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;
PHYSICAL DISABILITY;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RANK SUM TEST;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SHOULDER;
SPORT;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TENNIS ELBOW;
TENOTOMY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ELBOW;
MIDDLE AGED;
TENDON;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ELBOW JOINT;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TENDONS;
TENNIS ELBOW;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
|
EID: 4043124677
PISSN: 0301620X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B5.14469 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (114)
|
|
References (12)
|
