Isotopic difference in the heteronuclear loss rate in a two-species surface trap

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2004, Pages

  Holmes, M E ^a   Tscherneck, M ^a   Quinto Su, P A ^a   Bigelow, N P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; CESIUM; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; FLUORESCENCE; GROUND STATE; ISOTOPES; LASER TUNING; LIGHT INTERFERENCE; LIGHT POLARIZATION; MAGNETOOPTICAL EFFECTS; MIRRORS; MIXTURES; OPTICAL FILTERS; PHOTODETECTORS; RUBIDIUM; THIN FILMS;

ATOMIC NUMBER; ATOMIC SATURATION; HETERONUCLEAR LOSSES; MAGNETO-OPTICAL TRAPS;

ELECTRON TRAPS;

EID: 4043122641     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.063408     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. Reichel, W. Haensel, and T. W. Haensch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3398 (1999).
2. D. Cassettari, B. Hessmo, R. Folman, T. Maier, and J. Schmiedmayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5483 (2000).
3. N. H. Dekker, C. S. Lee, V. Lorent, J. H. Thywissen, S. P. Smith, M. Drndic, R. M. Westervelt, and M. Prentiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1124 (2000).
4. E. A. Hinds, C. J. Vale, and M. G. Boshier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1462 (2001).
5. J. Reichel, W. Haensel, P. Hommelhoff, and T. W. Haensch, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. B72, 81 (2001).
6. W. Haensel, P. Hommelhoff, T. W. Haensch, and J. Reichel, Nature (London) 413, 498 (2001).
7. H. Ott, J. Fortagh, G. Schlotterbeck, A. Grossmann, and C. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230401 (2001).
8. A. J. Kerman, J. M. Sage, S. Sainis, T. Bergeman, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033004 (2004).
9. D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
10. J. P. Shaffer, W. Chalupczak, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. A 60, R3365 (1999).
11. Y. E. Young, R. Ejnisman, J. P. Shaffer, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. A 62, 055403 (2000).
12. G. D. Telles, W. Garcia, L. G. Marcassa, and V. S. Bagnato, Phys. Rev. A 63, 033406 (2001).
13. B. Cheron, H. Gilles, J. Hamel, O. Moreau, and H. Sorel, J. Phys. III 4, 401 (1994).
14. K. L. Corwin, Z.-T. Lu, C. F. Hand, R. J. Epstein, and C. E. Wieman, Appl. Opt. 37, 3295 (1998).
15. 2 beam waist was carefully included.
16. U. D. Rapol, A. Wasan, and V. Natarajan, Phys. Rev. A 64, 023402 (2001).
17. C. D. Wallace, T. P. Dinneen, K. N. Tan, T. T. Grove, and P. L. Gould, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 897 (1992).
18. Rb-Rb in our fits which did not lead to an appreciable difference.
19. S. D. Gensemer, V. Sanchez-Villicana, K. Y. N. Tan, T. T. Grove, and P. L. Gould, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4055 (1997).