The 'Fresh Start' simulated surgery

Education for Primary Care

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 328-335

  Burrows, Peter ^a,b   Khan, Anwar ^c   Bowden, Reed ^c   Jackson, Neil ^c  

^a Abbey Mead Surgery   (United Kingdom)

^b Wessex Faculty RCGP   (United Kingdom)

^c London Deanery ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Examination; General practice; Simulated patients; Underperformance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CONSULTATION; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EXAMINATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MANAGEMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEAMWORK;

EID: 4043117549     PISSN: 14739879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rashid A, Allen J, Thew R and Aram G (1994) Performance-based assessment using simulated patients. Education for General Practice 5: 151-6.
2. Allen J, Evans A, Foulkes J and French A (1998) Simulated surgery in the summative assessment of general practice training: results of a trial in the Trent and Yorkshire Regions. British Journal of General Practice 48: 1219-23.
3. Sutcliffe R, Evans A, Pierce B and Bahrami J (1998) Simulated surgeries - feasibility of transfer from region to region. Education for General Practice 9: 203-10.
4. Bingham L, Burrows P, Caird R, Holsgrove G, Jackson N and Southgate L (1994) Simulated surgery: a framework for the assessment of clinical competence. Education for General Practice 5: 143-50.
5. Bingham L, Burrows PJ, Caird R, Holsgrove G and Jackson N (1996) Simulated surgery - using standardised patients to assess the clinical competence of GP registrars - a potential clinical component for the MRCGP examination. Education for General Practice 7: 102-11.
6. Burrows PJ and Bingham L (1999) The simulated surgery - an alternative to videotape submission for the consulting skills component of the MRCGP examination: the first year's experience. British Journal of General Practice 49: 269-72.
7. Southgate L, Cox J, David T et al (2001) The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures. Medical Education 35 (Suppl. 1): 2-8.
8. Joshi H, Dare D, Buffett G and John C (1996) Teaching and learning consulting skills with simulated patients: a pilot study for GP registrars. Education for General Practice 7: 36-41.
9. McGill R, Fouracre R, Evans A and Bahrami J (1999) A regional objective structured clinical examination - development and evaluation. Education for General Practice 10: 29-39.
10. Cohen R, Amiel G, Tann M, Shechter A, Weingarten M and Reis S (2002) Performance assessment of community-based physicians: evaluating the reliability and validity of a tool for determining CME needs. Academic Medicine 77: 1247-54.
11. Cunnington J, Hanna E, Turnhbull J, Kaigas T and Norman G (1997) Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician. Academic Medicine 72: 9-12.
12. Department of Health (1999) Supporting Doctors, Protecting Patients. Department of Health: London.
13. Taylor G (1998) Underperforming doctors: a postal survey of the Northern Deanery. British Medical Journal 316: 1705-8.
14. Bahrami J and Evans A (2001) Underperforming doctors in general practice: a survey of referrals to UK Deaneries. British Journal of General Practice 51: 892-6.
15. Joesbury H, Mathers N and Lane P (2001) Supporting GPs whose performance gives cause for concern: the North Trent experience. Family Practice 18: 123-30.
16. Bowden R (2002) The underperforming doctor. Education for Primary Care 13: 223-7.