Two types of pronouns and variable binding

Language

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 770-797

  Noguchi, Tohru ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043116528     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.1997.0021     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ABE, JUN. 1992. Zibun as distributor and its interaction with pronominal kare. North Eastern Linguistic Society 22.1-15.
2. ABNEY, STEVEN. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
3. AOUN, JOSEPH, and NORBERT HORNSTEIN. 1992. Bound and referential pronouns. Logical structure and linguistic structure, ed. by C.-T. James Huang and Robert May, 1-23. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. AUTHIER, J. MARC. 1988. The syntax of unselective binding. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
5. BARWISE, JON, and ROBIN COOPER. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4.159-219.
6. BERMAN, STEPHEN. 1989. An analysis of quantificational variability in indirect wh-questions. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 8.29-43.
7. BORER, HAGIT. 1989. Anaphoric Agr. The null subject parameter, ed. by Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth J. Safir, 69-109. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. BRAME, MICHAEL. 1981. The general theory of binding and fusion. Linguistic Analysis 7.277-325.
9. _. 1982. The head-selector theory of lexical specifications and the nonexistence of coarse categories. Linguistic Analysis 10.321-25.
10. BURZIO, LUIGI. 1989. On the non-existence of disjoint reference principles. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 14.3-27.
11. _. 1991. The morphological basis of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27.81-105.
12. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
13. _. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. DELORME, EVELYNE, and RAY C. DOUGHERTY. 1972. Appositive NP constructions: we, the men; we men; I, a man; etc. Foundations of Language 8.2-29.
15. DÉPREZ, VIVIANE. 1989. On the typology of syntactic positions and the nature of chains. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
16. EVANS, GARETH. 1977. Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses (1). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7.467-536.
17. _. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11.337-62.
18. FIENGO, ROBERT, and ROBERT MAY. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. FINER, DANIEL L. 1985. The syntax of switch-reference. Linguistic Inquiry 16.35-55.
20. FUKUI, NAOKI. 1986. A theory of category projection and its applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
21. _. 1988. Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: A case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics 5.249-70.
22. _, and MARGARET SPEAS. 1986. Specifiers and projection. MIT working papers in linguistics 8, ed. by Naoki Fukui, Tova Rapoport, and Elizabeth Sagey, 128-72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics.
23. GEACH, PETER T. 1962. Reference and generality: An examination of some medieval and modern theories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. GIORGI, ALESSANDRA, and GIUSEPPE LONGOBARDI. 1991. The syntax of noun phrases: Configuration, parameters and empty categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. GRODZINSKY, YOSEF, and TANYA REINHART. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24.69-101.
26. HAÏK, ISABELLE. 1984. Indirect binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15.185-223.
27. HALE, KENNETH. 1992. Subject obviation, switch reference, and control. Control and grammar, ed. by Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, 51-77. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. HASEGAWA, NOBUKO. 1984/1985. On the so-called 'zero pronouns' in Japanese. Linguistic Review 4.289-341.
29. HEIM, IRENE. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
30. HELLAN, LARS. 1986. The headedness of NPs in Norwegian. Features and projections, ed. by Peter Muysken and Henk van Riemsdijk, 89-122. Dordrecht: Foris.
31. HIGGINBOTHAM, JAMES. 1980. Anaphora and GB: Some preliminary remarks. North Eastern Linguistic Society 10.223-36.
32. _. 1992. Anaphoric reference and common reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MS.
33. HOJI, HAJIME. 1990. Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, MS.
34. _. 1991. Kare. Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, ed. by Carol Georgopoulos and Roberta Ishihara, 287-304. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
35. _. 1995. Demonstrative binding and principle B. North Eastern Linguistic Society 25.255-71.
36. HONG, SUNGSHIM. 1985. A and A′ binding in Korean and English: Government-binding parameters. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
37. HORNSTEIN, NORBERT, and AMY WEINBERG. 1988. Logical form - Its existence and its properties. Constituent structure, ed. by Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, and Giuliana Giusti, 143-56. Dordrecht: Foris.
38. _, _. 1990. The necessity of LF. Linguistic Review 7.129-67.
39. HUANG, C.-T. JAMES. 1991. Remarks on the status of the null object. Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, ed. by Robert Freidin, 56-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2.21-35.
41. _. 1977. X′ syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. KAMEYAMA, MEGUMI. 1988. Japanese zero pronominal binding: Where syntax and discourse meet. Papers from the second international workshop on Japanese syntax, ed. by William J. Poser, 47-74. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
43. KAMP, HANS. 1984. A theory of truth and semantic representation. Truth, interpretation, and information, ed. by J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof, 1-41. Dordrecht: Foris.
44. KANG, MYUNG-YOON. 1988. Topics in Korean syntax: Phrase structure, variable binding and movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
45. KATADA, FUSA. 1991. The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22.287-313.
46. KAYNE, RICHARD S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. KITAGAWA, CHISATO. 1981. Anaphora in Japanese: kare and zibun. Coyote Papers 2.61-75. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistic Circle.
48. _, and CLAUDIA N. G. ROSS. 1982. Prenominal modification in Chinese and Japanese. Linguistic Analysis 9.19-53.
49. KUNO, SUSUMU. 1972. Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Lingusitic Inquiry 3.161-95.
50. _. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. KURODA, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
52. _. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Papers from the second international workshop on Japanese syntax, ed. by William J. Poser, 103-43. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
53. LASNIK, HOWARD. 1976. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2.1-22.
54. _. 1989. On the necessity of binding conditions. Essays on anaphora, by Howard Lasnik, 149-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
55. LEWIS, DAVID. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. Formal semantics of natural language, ed. by Edward L. Keenan, 3-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. LONGOBARDI, GIUSEPPE. 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25.609-65.
57. MAHAJAN, ANOOP K. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
58. MCCAWLEY, NORIKO A. 1976. Reflexivization: A transformational approach. Syntax and semantics, vol. 5: Japanese generative grammar, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 51-116. New York, NY: Academic Press.
59. MIKAMI, AKIRA. [1953] 1972. Gendai gohoo zyosetu. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
60. MONTAGUE, RICHARD. 1974. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, ed. by Richmond Thomason, 247-70. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61. MONTALBETTI, MARIO. 1984. After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
62. MURASUGI, KEIKO. 1991. Noun phrases in Japanese and English: A study in syntax, learnability and acquisition. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
63. NAKAI, SATORU. 1976. A study of anaphoric relations in Japanese. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, MS.
64. NISHIGAUCHI, TAISUKE. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
65. _, and ASAKO UCHIBORI. 1991. Japanese bare NPs and syntax-semantics correspondences in quantification. Osaka: Osaka University, MS.
66. NOGUCHI, TOHRU. 1993. Pronominal binding and syntactic categories. North Eastern Linguistic Society 23.351-65.
67. _. 1995. The role of syntactic categories in anaphora. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
68. _. 1997. Local anaphora and economy. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology, MS.
69. OHSO, MIEKO. 1976. A study of zero pronominalization in Japanese. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University dissertation.
70. OSHIMA, SHIN. 1979. Conditions on rules: Anaphora in Japanese. Explorations in linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue, ed. by George Bedell, Eichi Kobayashi, and Masatake Muraki, 423-48. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
71. OYAKAWA, TAKATSUGU. 1973. Japanese reflexivization 1. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 2.94-135.
72. PARTEE, BARBARA H. 1973. Some structural analogies between tense and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70.601-9.
73. _. 1978. Bound variables and other anaphors. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2.79-85. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
74. _. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7.243-86.
75. PESETSKY, DAVID. 1978. Category switching and so-called so-called pronouns. Chicago Linguistic Society 14.350-61.
76. PICALLO, M. CARME. 1994. Catalan possessive pronouns: The avoid pronoun principle revisited. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12.259-99.
77. POSTAL, PAUL M. 1969. On so-called 'pronouns' in English. Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 201-24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
78. REINHART, TANYA. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
79. _. 1986. Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. 1, ed. by Barbara Lust, 123-50. Dordrecht: Reidel.
80. SAG, IVAN A. 1976. Deletion and logical form, Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
81. SAITO, MAMORU. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
82. _. 1992. Long-distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.69-118.
83. _, and HAJIME HOJI. 1983. Weak crossover and move α in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1.245-59.
84. _, and KEIKO MURASUGI. 1990. N′-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. Japanese/ Korean linguistics, ed. by Hajime Hoji, 285-301. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
85. SHIBATANI, MASAYOSHI. 1973. Semantics of Japanese causativization. Foundations of Language 9.327-73.
86. STOCKWELL, ROBERT P.; PAUL SCHACHTER; and BARBARA H. PARTEE. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
87. SZABOLCSI, ANNA. 1981. The possessive construction in Hungarian: A configurational category in a non-configurational language. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31.261-89.
88. _. 1983/1984. The possessor that ran away from home. Linguistic Review 3.89-102.
89. _. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 2, ed. by Istvan Kenesei, 167-89. Budapest: Jate Szeged.
90. TATEISHI, KOICHI. 1988. On the universality of X-bar theory: The case of Japanese. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 7.331-45.
91. _. 1989. Subjects, SPEC, and DP in Japanese. North Eastern Linguistic Society 19.405-18.
92. UEDA, MASANOBU. 1990. Japanese phrase structure and parameter setting. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
93. VERGNAUD, JEAN-ROGER, and MARIA LUISA ZUBIZARRETA. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable construction in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23.595-652.
94. WATANABE, AKIRA. 1995. Switch reference in control: Toward a minimal theory of control. Tokyo: Kanda University of International Studies, MS.
95. WHITMAN, JOHN. 1981. The internal structure of NP in verb final languages. Chicago Linguistic Society 17.411-18.
96. _. 1986. A unified account of zero pronoun phenomena. Working papers from the first SDF workshop in Japanese syntax. La Jolla, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.
97. WILLIAMS, EDWIN. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8.101-39.
98. YOSHIMURA, NORIKO. 1989. Parasitic pronouns. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, MS.