On the applicability of some IRT models for repeated measurement designs: Conditions, consequences, and goodness-of-fit tests

MPR-online

Volumn 7, Issue , 2002, Pages 21-40

  Ponocny, Ivo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Dept for Psychology ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Goodness of fit tests; LLRA; LLTM; Measurement of change

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043113326     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
2. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bras, J. (2000). Evaluation des Religionsunterrichts. Eine Einstellungsveränderungsmessung bezüglich Sekten anhand zweier Lehrfilme. [Evaluation of religious education. A measurement of the change of the attitude towards sects due to two films. In German.] University of Vienna: Unpublished master's thesis.
4. Davier, von, M. (1997). WINMIRA - program description and recent enhancements. Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 2, No. 2.
5. Fischer, G.H. (1972). A measurement model for the effect of mass-media. Acta Psychologica, 36, 207-220.
6. Fischer, G.H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374.
7. Fischer, G.H. (1977). Linear logistic trait models: Theory and application. In H. Spada & W. F. Kempf (Eds.), Structural models of thinking and learning (pp. 203-225). Bern: Huber.
8. Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48, 3-26.
9. Fischer, G.H. (1987). Applying the principle of specific objectivity and generalizability to the measurement of change. Psychometrika, 52, 565-587.
10. Fischer, G.H. (1989). An IRT-based model for dichotomous longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 54, 599-624.
11. Fischer, G. H. (1995a). Derivations of the Rasch model. In G.H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 15-38). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Fischer, G. H. (1995b). The linear logistic test model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 131-155). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Fischer, G. H. (1995c). Linear logistic models for change. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 157-180). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Fischer, G. H. (1995d). Some Neglected Problems in IRT. Psychometrika, 60, 449-487.
15. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995). Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Fischer, G.H., & Ponocny-Seliger, E. (1998). Structural Rasch modeling. Handbook of the usage of LpcM-Win 1.0. Groningen: ProGAMMA.
17. Formann, A.K. (1994). Measuring change in latent subgroups using dichotomous data: unconditional, conditional, and semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1027-1034.
18. Formann, A.K., & Ponocny, I. (2002). Latent change classes in dichotomous data. Psychmetrika, in press.
19. Glas, C. A. W. & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch Models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69-95). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Glück, J., & Spiel, Ch. (1997a). Response-Modelle für Meßwiederholungsdesigns: Anwendung und Grenzen verschiedener Ansätze. [Item response models for repeated measurement designs: application and limitation of several approaches. In German.] Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 2, No. 1.
21. Gl̈uck, J., & Spiel, Ch. (1997b). Zur Analyse individueller Veränderungsunterschiede mit Item-Response-Modellen - Eine Antwort auf Stelzl (1997). [On the analysis of individual change differences by means of item response models. A response to Stelzl (1997). In German.] Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 2, No. 2.
22. Heinritz, C. (2000). Die Effektivität von Telefontrainings im professionellen Bereich. Eine Studie am Beispiel des Telefontrainings des Unternehmens "Telecompany". [The effectiveness of professional telephone training. A study on a training of the "Telecompany" enterprise. In German.] University of Vienna: Unpublished master's thesis.
23. Meiser, T. (1996). Loglinear Rasch models for the analysis of stability and change. Psychometrika, 61, 629-645.
24. Meiser, T., Stern, E., & Langeheine, R. (1998). Latent change in discrete data: unidimensional, multidimensional, and mixture distribution Rasch models for the analyses of repeated observations. Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 3, No. 2.
25. Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Estimation of item parameters. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 39-51). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Ponocny, I. (1996). Kombinatorische Modelltests für das Rasch-Modell. [Combinatorial goodness-of-fit tests for the Rasch model.] (Doctoral Thesis.) Vienna: University of Vienna.
27. Ponocny, I. (2001). Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 66, 437-460.
28. Ponocny, I., & Ponocny-Seliger, E. (1999). T-Rasch 1.0. Groningen: ProGAMMA.
29. Rao, A.R., Jana, R., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1996). A Markov chain Monte Carlo method for generating random (0,1)-matrices with given marginals. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 58 (2), 225-242.
30. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Kopenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
31. Rasch, G. (1967). An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. In L. J. Van der Kamp & C. A. J. Vlek (Eds.), Psychological measurement theory (pp. 1-19). Proceedings of the NUFFIC international summer session in science at "Het oude Hof", The Hague, July 14-28, 1966. Leyden: University of Leyden.
32. Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 271-282.
33. Rost, J. (1996). Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion. [Test theory, test construction. In German.] Berne: Huber.
34. Rost, J., & Davier v., M. (1995) Mixture distribution Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 257-268). New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Scheiblechner, H. (1972). Das Lernen und Lösen komplexer Denkaufgaben. [The learning and solving of complex reasoning items.] Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 3, 456-506.
36. Snijders, T. A. B. (1991). Enumeration and simulation methods for 0-1 matrices with given marginals. Psychometrika, 56, 397-417.
37. Stelzl, I. (1997). Wie realistisch sind die Voraussetzungen von Item-Response-Modellen bei der Prüfung experimenteller Hypothesen in Meßwiederholungsdesigns? - Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Glück, J. & Spiel, Ch. (1997). [How realistic are the conditions of item response models for testing hypotheses in repeated measurement designs? A discussion on Glück, J., & Spiel, Ch. (1997). In German.] Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 2, No. 1.
38. Vermunt, J.K., and Magidson, J. (2000) Latent GOLD 2.0. User's Guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.