The odds favor antitypes - A comparison of tests for the identification of configural types and antitypes

MPR-online

Volumn 7, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-29

  Von Eye, Alexander ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043111884     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
3. Andrews, D.F., Gnanadesikan, R., & J.L. Warner (1973). Methods for assessing multivariate normality. In P.R. Krishnaiah (ed.), Multivariate analysis - III (pp. 95 - 116). New York: Academic Press.
4. Anscombe, F. J. (1953). Contribution of discussion of paper by H. Hotelling 'New light on the correlation coefficient and its transform'. Journal of the Royal Statistical Spciety, 15(B), 229 - 230.
5. Christensen, R. (1997). Log-linear models and logistic regression. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
6. DuMouchel, W. (1999). Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. The American Statistician, 53, 177 - 190.
7. Indurkhya, A., & von Eye, A. (2000). The power of tests in Configural Frequency Analysis. Psychologische Beiträge, 42, 301 - 308.
8. Küchenhoff, H. (1986). A note on a continuity correction for testing in three-dimensional configural frequency analysis. Biometrical Journal, 28, 465 - 468.
9. Lehmacher, W. (1981). A more powerful simultaneous test procedure in Configural Frequency Analysis. Biometrical Journal, 23, 429 - 436.
10. Lienert, G. A. (1969). Die "Konfigurationsfrequenzanalyse" als Klassifikationsmethode in der klinischen Psychologie. In M. Irle (ed.), Bericht über den 26. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Tübingen 1968 (pp. 244 - 253). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
11. Lindner, K. (1984). Eine exakte Auswertungsmethode zur Konfigurationsfrequenzanalyse. Psychologische Beiträge, 26, 393 - 415.
12. Naud, S. J. (1997). Categorical data analysis: Type I error rate as a function of sampling distribution and hypothesis. Unpublished paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
13. Naud, S. J. (1999). Factors influencing Pearson's chi-squared statistic's fit to its asymptotic distributions: implications for sample size guidelines. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
14. Rai, A., Srivastava, A.K., & Gupta, H.C. (2001). Small sample comparison of modified chi-square test statistics for survey data. Biometrical Journal, 43, 483 - 495.
15. von Eye, A. (1988). The general linear model as framework for models in configural frequency analysis. Biometrical Journal, 30, 59 - 67.
16. von Eye, A. (2000). Configural Frequency Analysis - Version 2000 program for 32 bit operating systems. Methods of Psychological Research - Online, 6, 129 - 139.
17. von Eye, A.(2001). Configural Frequency Analysis - methods, models, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (in preparation).
18. von Eye, A., & Rovine, M. J. (1988). A comparison of significance tests for Configural Frequency Analysis. EDP in Medicine and Biology, 19, 6 - 13.
19. von Eye, A., & Schuster, C. (1998). On the specification of models for Configural Frequency Analysis - Sampling schemes in Prediction CFA. Methods of Psychological Research - Online, 3, 55 - 73.
20. von Eye, A., Schuster, C., & Gutiérrez-Peña, E. (2000). Configural Frequency Analysis under retrospective and prospective sampling schemes - frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Psychologische Beiträge, 42, 428 - 447.
21. Wilkinson, L. (2000). SYSTAT 10. Chicago, IL: SPSS.