The new consumer of medicine - The pharmacy technicians' perspective

Pharmacy World and Science

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 203-207

  Traulsen, Janine M ^a   Noerreslet, Mikkel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Consumer satisfaction; Denmark; Expert knowledge; Lay knowledge; Pharmacy services; Pharmacy technicians; Risk theory

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; NON PRESCRIPTION DRUG; PARACETAMOL;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PARENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHARMACY; PREDICTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIDE EFFECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; COMMUNITY PHARMACY SERVICES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; PHARMACISTS' AIDES; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 4043104219     PISSN: 09281231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:PHAR.0000035883.44707.6e     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Lewis D, Bridger D. The soul of the new consumer - authenticity what we buy and why in the new economy. London: Nicholas Brealey 2000.
2. Winkler F. Consumerism in health care: beyond the supermarket model. Policy Polit 1987; 15 (1): 1-8.
3. Herzlinger RE. Market-driven health care: who wins, who loses in the transformation of America's largest service industry. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1997.
4. Weiss M, Fitzpatrick R. Challenges to medicine: the case of prescribing. Soc Health Illness 1997; 19: 297-327.
5. Morgall JM, Almarsdóttir AB. The new consumer - implications for pharmacy. Int J Pharm Prac 1999; 21: 198-201.
6. Nettelton S. The sociology of health and illness. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
7. Hassell K, Noyce P, Rogers A et al. Advice provided in British community pharmacies - what people want and what they get. J Health Serv Res Policy 1998; 3 (4): 219-25.
8. Hibbert D, Bissell P, Ward PR. Consumerism and professional work in the community pharmacy. Sociol Health III 2002; 1 (24): 46-65.
9. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage 1992.
10. Møldrup C. Risk of future drugs - expert and citizen perspectives. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy 2000.
11. Møldrup C, Morgall JM, Almarsdóttir A. Perceived risk of future drugs - a Danish citizen Delphi. Health Risk Soc 2002; 1 (4): 5-17.
12. Abraham J, Sheppard J. Democracy, technocracy, and the secret state of medicines control: expert and non-expert perspectives. Sci Technol Hum Val 1997; 22 (2): 139-67.
13. Lidskog R. In science we trust? Acta Sociol 1996; (9): 31-56.
14. Blaxter M, Britten N. Lay beliefs about drugs and medicines and the implications for community pharmacy. A review paper. Pharm Pract Res. The Resource Centre 1997.
15. Morgall Traulsen JM, Almarsdóttir AB, Björnsdóttir I. The lay user perspective on the quality of pharmaceuticals, drug therapy and pharmacy services. Pharm World Sci 2002; 24 (5): 196-200.
16. Almarsdóttir AB, Morgall JM, Björnsdóttir I. A question of emphasis: efficiency or equality in the provision of pharmaceuticals. Int J Health Plann Manag 2000; 15: 149-61.
17. Edwards T. Contradictions of consumption. Buckingham: Open University Press 2000.
18. Kvale S. InterViews - an introduction to qualitative reserearch interviewing 1996. London: Sage Publications.
19. Airaksinen, M. Customer feedback as a tool for improving pharmacy services in Finland (dissertation). Kuopio University: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1994.
20. Britten N. Patients' ideas about medicines: a qualitative study in a general practice population. Br J Gen Pract 1994: 44 (387): 465-8.
21. Britten N. Lay views of drugs and medicines: orthodox and unorthodox accounts: In Williams S, Calnan M (eds) Modern medicine - lay perspectives and experiences. London: UCL Press 1996: 48-73.