Using and being used by categories: The case of negative evaluations and daily well-being

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 521-526

  Robinson, Michael D ^a   Vargas, Patrick T ^b   Tamir, Maya ^b   Solberg, Emily C ^b  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

AFFECT; HUMANS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 4043094160     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00713.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bassili, J.N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
2. Bower, G.H. (1987). Commentary on mood and memory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 443-455.
3. Bower, G.H., & Forgas, J.P. (2000). Affect, memory, and social cognition. In E. Eich, J.F. Kihlstrom, G.H. Bower, J.P. Forgas, & P.M. Niedenthal (Eds.), Cognition and emotion (pp. 87-168). London: Oxford University Press.
4. Fazio, R.H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M.S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Fazio, R.H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R.E. Petty & J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Goldberg, L.R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
7. Gotlib, I.H., & Abramson, L.Y. (1999). Attributional theories of emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M.J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 613-636). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
9. Kelly, G.A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
10. MacLeod, C. (1993). Cognition in clinical psychology: Measures, methods, or models? Behaviour Change, 10, 169-195.
11. Meier, B.P., & Robinson, M.D. (in press). Does quick to blame mean quick to anger?: The role of agreeableness in dissociating blame and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
12. Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2001). The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-666.
13. Robinson, M.D. (2000). The reactive and prospective functions of mood: Its role in linking daily events and cognitive well-being. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 145-176.
14. Robinson, M.D. (2004). Personality as performance: Categorization tendencies and their correlates. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 127-129.
15. Robinson, M.D., & Neighbors, C. (in press). Catching the mind in action: Implicit methods in personality research and assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment: A multimethod perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Robinson, M.D., Vargas, P., & Crawford, E.G. (2003). Putting process into personality, appraisal, and emotion: Evaluative processing as a missing link. In J. Musch & C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 275-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Sanders, A.F. (1998). Elements of human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Smith, E.E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Review, 69, 77-110.
19. Tamir, M., Robinson, M.D., & Clore, G.L. (2002). The epistemic benefits of trait-consistent mood states: An analysis of extraversion and mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 663-677.
20. Toglia, M.P., & Battig, W.F. (1978). Handbook of semantic norms. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.