Influence of sinus surgery in rhinometric measurements

Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 98-103

  Numminen, Jura ^a   Dastidar, Prasun ^a   Rautiainen, Markus ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Acoustic rhinometry; Computed tomography volumetry; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Rhinomanometry; Rhinometric measurements; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CHRONIC SINUSITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ETHMOIDECTOMY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MIDDLE MEATAL ANTROSTOMY; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; PARANASAL SINUS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; RHINOMANOMETRY; RHINOMETRY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 4043093349     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2004.02092     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Messeklinger W. Endoscopy of the nose. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1978.
2. Stammberger H. Endoscopic surgery-concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I. Anatomic and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:143-7.
3. Kennedy DW. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:643-9.
4. Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:576-81.
5. Stammberger H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1991.
6. Roithmann R, Shankar L, Hawke M, et al. CT imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of sinus disease: a partnership between the radiologist and the otolaryngologist. J Otolaryngol 1993;22:253-60.
7. Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgeryconcepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:147-56.
8. Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol Suppl 2000;16:3-17.
9. Broms P, Jonson B, Lamm CJ. Rhinomanometry. II. A system for numerical description of nasal airway resistance. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1982;94:157-68.
10. Clement PA. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1984;22:151-5.
11. Sipilä J, Suonpaa J, Silvoniemi P, Laippala P. Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1995;57:260-3.
12. Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Numminen J, et al. Semi-automatic segmentation of computed tomographic images in volumetric estimation of nasal airway. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999;256:192-8.
13. Kennedy DW, Wright ED, Goldberg AN. Objective and subjective outcomes in surgery for chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 2000;110:29-31.
14. Lund VJ, Holmstrom M, Scadding GK. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. An objective assessment. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:832-5.
15. Clement PA. Definitions of sinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1997;51:201-3.
16. Dastidar P, Numminen J, Heinonen T, et al. Nasal airway volumetric measurement using segmented HRCT images and acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 1999;13:97-103.
17. Jones AS, Willat DJ, Durham LM. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:909-11.
18. Gosepath J, Belafsky P, Kaldenbach T, et al. The use of acoustic rhinometry in predicting outcomes after sinonasal surgery. Am J Rhinol 2000;14:97-100.