Visual pattern recognition in Drosophila is invariant for retinal position

Science

Volumn 305, Issue 5686, 2004, Pages 1020-1022

  Tang, Shiming ^a   Wolf, Reinhard ^b   Xu, Shuping ^a   Heisenberg, Martin ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT SIMULATORS; VISION;

TRANSLATION INVARIANCE; VISUAL PATTERNS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

BIOLOGY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SIMULATOR; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ANIMALS; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RETINA; SIZE PERCEPTION;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; INSECTA; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 4043087882     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1099839     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Heisenberg, R. Wolf, J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 130, 113 (1979).
2. R. Wolf, M. Heisenberg, J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 169, 699 (1991).
3. M. Dill, R. Wolf, M. Heisenberg, Nature 355, 751 (1993).
4. M. Dill, M. Heisenberg, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 349, 143 (1995).
5. M. Dill, R. Wolf, M. Heisenberg. Learn. Mem. 2, 152 (1995).
6. R. Wehner, M. Müller, Nature 315, 228 (1985).
7. R. Emst, M. Heisenberg, Vision Res. 39, 3920 (1999).
8. S. M. Tang, A. K. Guo, Science 294, 1543 (2001).
9. Note that flies discriminated the rectangles by hue rather than brightness, because varying the relative intensities of the two colors by a factor of 10 between training and test has no significant effect on memory performance.
10. M. Heisenberg, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 475 (1995).
11. In the flight simulator, an orientation task is used to measure pattern recognition and translation invariance. In order to retrieve a particular flight direction relative to the panorama in the memory test, the fly has to store the respective pattern (feature) during the training not only for recognition but also by an azimuth value for orientation (e.g., direction of flight).
12. In previous experiments (3, 6), the transparency in the arena carrying the figures had been exchanged between training and test. This procedure required 30 to 60 s. Also, for half of the flies, the pattern changed from a lower to a higher position; for the other half, the sequence was the opposite. In the present experiments, the whole arena was shifted after the final training and the shift was always 20° upward. The new procedure implied that, not only the figures, but also the upper and lower margins of the arena were displaced, but the shift took only an instant and did not entail any visual disturbances from handling. Control experiments showed the same basic results with the old and new procedures. For instance, flies trained with horizontal bars at different heights (Δ4 = 20°) to avoid certain flight directions were unable to retrieve this information if, after the training, the whole arena was shifted upward by 20° (30), this inability confirmed that the flies' pattern recognition system does not tolerate the vertical displacement if vertical position is the discriminating pattern parameter.
13. R. Wehner, Nature 215, 1244 (1967).
14. R. Wehner, M. Lindauer, Z. Vgl. Physiol. 52, 290 (1966).
15. J. H. van Hateren, M. V. Srinivasan, P. B. Wait, J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 167, 649 (1990).
16. M. V. Srinivasan, S.W. Zhang, K. Witney, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 343, 199 (1994).
17. A. Horridge, J. Insect. Physiol. 44, 343 (1998).
18. M. Dill, thesis, University of Würzburg (1992).
19. As pattern recognition in honey bees is studied with freely moving animals, a formal test for translation invariance has not been possible. Nevertheless, retinotopic template-matching can be excluded as the sole mechanism (31). In particular, the data clearly indicate that the orientation of edges can be recognized independent of their precise location on the visual array (32).
20. E. Buchner, thesis, University of Tübingen (1971)
21. B. Bausenwein, R. Wolf, M. Heisenberg, J. Neurogenet. 3, 87 (1985).
22. R. Hengstenberg, Kybernetik 9, 56 (1971).
23. M. Heisenberg, R. Wolf, B. Brembs, Learn. Mem. 8, 1 (2001).
24. R. Wolf, M. Heisenberg, J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 140, 69 (1980).
25. S. Schuster, thesis, University of Tübingen (1996).
26. M. I. Posner, C. R. R. Snyder, B. J. Davidson, J. Exp. Psychol. Genet. 109, 160 (1980).
27. M. Heisenberg, R. Wolf, Vision in Drosophila: Genetics of Microbehavior, V. Braitenberg, Ed. (Studies of Brain Function, vol. 12, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
28. D. H. Hubel, Eye, Brain, and Vision (Scientific American Library, New York. 1988).
29. M. Livingstone, D. Hubel, Science 240, 740 (1988).
30. S. Tang, R. Wolf, S. Xu, M. Heisenberg, unpublished results.
31. D. Efler, B. Ronacher, Vision Res. 40, 3391 (2000).
32. M. V. Srinivasan, S. W. Zhang, B. Rolfe, Nature 362, 539 (1993).
33. We thank B. Ronacher and L. Wiskott for valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (SFB 554) and the Multidisciplinary Research program of the Chinese Academy of Science (S.T.).