Bound morphemes, coordination and bracketing paradox

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 297-320

  Fukushima, Kazuhiko ^a  

^a KANSAI GAIDAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043084489     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002222679900763X     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
3. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. & Pereira, F. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 399-452.
6. Di Sciullo, M. A. & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Fiengo, R. & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Fukushima, K. (1993). A typology in higher-order unification approach to ellipsis: the implications of Japanese post-verbal expressions. In Guemter, J., Kaiser, B., & Zol, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society. 381-389.
9. Fukushima, K. (1998). Negation in the lexicon, not in NegP. In Gruber, M. C. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society. 171-184.
10. Foley, W. & Van Valin, R. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Godard, D. (1989). Empty categories as subjects of tensed Ss in English or French. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 497-506.
12. Hasegawa, N. (1984-85). On the so-called zero pronouns in Japanese. The Linguistic Review. 4. 289-341.
13. Kitagawa, Y. (1986). Subjects in Japanese and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
14. Klein, E. & Sag, I. (1985). Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8. 163-201.
15. Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1983). What can Japanese say about government and binding. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 2. Stanford: CSLI. 153-164.
17. Lappin, S. (1996). The interpretation of ellipsis. In Lappin, S. (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 145-175.
18. Lapointe, S. (1980). A theory of grammatical agreement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
19. Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Nakamura, A. (1994). On the tense system of Japanese. In Akatsuka, N. (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Vol. 4. Stanford: CSLI. 368-377.
21. Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ogihara, T. (1986). Obligatory focus in Japanese and type-shifting principles. In Crowhurst, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 6. Stanford: CSLI. 213-227.
23. Partee, B. & Rooth, M. (1983). Generalized conjunction and type ambiguities. In Bäeuerle, R. et al. (eds.) Meaning, use, and interpretation of language. Berlin: De Gruyter. 361-383.
24. Pestesky, D. (1985). Morphology and logical form. Linguistics Inquiry 16. 193-246.
25. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and structure of IP. Linguistics Inquiry 20. 365-424.
26. Prüst, H., Scha, R. & Van Den Berg, M. (1994). Discourse grammar and verb phrase anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17. 261-327.
27. Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
28. Sells, P. (1995). Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexicalist perspective. Linguistics Inquiry 26. 277-325.
29. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Steele, S., Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Jelinek, E. Kitagawa, C., Dehrle, R. & Wasow, T. (1981). An encyclopedia of AUX. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Van Valin, R. (1986). An empty category as the subject of a tensed S in English. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 581-86.
32. Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 101-39.