The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 249-257

  Nixon, John ^a   Duffy, Steven ^a   Armstrong, Nigel ^a   Craig, Dawn ^a   Glanville, Julie ^a   Christie, James ^a   Drummond, Michael ^a   Kleijnen, Jos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Review; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DATA ACQUISITION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

DATA EXTRACTION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE ECONOMIC EVALUATION DATABASE (NHS EED);

HEALTH CARE;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DATA BASE; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; MEDLINE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 4043074760     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462304001059     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Bentkover JD, Corey R. Effective utilisation of pharmacoeconomics for decision makers. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2002;10:75-80.
2. CCOHTA. Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Co-ordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment; 1997.
3. Commonwealth of Australia. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee: Including submissions involving economic analyses. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office; 1995.
4. Drummond M, Jefferson T. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 1996; 313:275-283.
5. Hjelmgren J, Berggren F, Andersson F. Health economic guidelines-similarities, differences and some implications. Value Health. 2001;4:225-250.
6. Hoffman C, Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg J. The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making: A European survey. Health Policy. 2000;52:179-192.
7. Hoffman C, Nixon J, Stoykova BA, et al. Do decision-makers find economic evaluations useful? results of recent focus group research in the UK. Value Health. 2002;5:71-78.
8. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technical guidance for manufacturers and sponsors on making a submission to a technology appraisal. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2001.
9. Nixon J, Phipps K, Mugford M, et al. Using economic evidence to support decision-making: A case study of assertive community treatment within the UK National Service Framework for Mental Health. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;1:179-190.
10. Nixon J, Ulmann P, Glanville J, et al. The European Network of Health Economic Evaluation databases (EURONHEED) project. Eur J Health Econom, 2004. In press.
11. Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:iii,ix-x,1-51.
12. Sassi F, Archard L, McDaid D. Searching literature databases for health care economic evaluations: How systematic can we afford to be? Med Care. 2002;40:387-394.
13. Stoykova BA, Drummond MF, Barbieri M, Kleijnen J. The lag between effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence of new drugs: Implications for decision-making in health care. Eur J Health Econom. 2003;4:313-318.