A potential for an integrated view of development and learning: Galperin's contribution to sociocultural psychology

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 278-288

  Arievitch, Igor M ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043072836     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1004_2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arievitch, I. M., & Stetsenko, A. P. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Galperin's contribution and its implications. Human Development, 43(3), 69-92
2. Arievitch, I. M., & Van der Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Galperin's contribution. Human Development, 38, 113-126
3. Bem, S., & Keijzer, F, (1996). Recent changes in the concept of cognition. Theory & Psychology, 6(3), 449-469
4. Galperin, P. Ia. (1965). Osnovnye rezultaty issledovanii po probleme 'formirovanie umstvennykh deistviii i poniatii' [The main results of the study on mental actions and concepts formation]. Unpublished manuscript,MoscowState University
5. Galperin, P. Ia. (1976). Vvedenie v psikhologiiu [Introduction to psychology]. Moscow: Moscow State University Press
6. Galperin, P. Ia (1989). The problem of attention. Soviet Psychology, 27(3), 83-92. (Original work published 1976)
7. Galperin, P. Ia. (1992a). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4), 60-80. (Original work published 1978)
8. Galperin, P. Ia. (1992b). The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4) 37-59. (Original work published 1977)
9. Galperin, P. Ia. (1998a). Razlichie v ispol'zovanii orudii u cheloveka i vspomogatel'nykh sredstv u zhivotnykh i ego psikhologicheskoe znachenie [The difference between human tool use and the use of auxiliary means in animals and its psychological significance]. In P. Ia. Galperin, Psikhologiia kak Obyektivnaya Nauka [Psychology As an Objective Science] (pp. 37-93). Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original work written in 1935)
10. Galperin, P. Ia. (1998b). Metod, fakty i teorii v psikhologii formirovaniia umstvennykh deistvii i poniatii [The method, facts, and theories in the mental actions and concepts formation]. In P. Ia. Galperin, Psikhologiia kak obyektivnaya nauka [Psychology as an objective science] (pp. 389-398). Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original work published 1966)
11. Galperin, P. Ia., & Elkonin, D. B. (1972). K teorii J. Piaget o razvitii detskogo myshleniia [On Piaget's theory of development of child's thinking] . In J. Flavell, Geneticheskaia psikhologiia Zhana Piazhe [The genetic psychology of Jean Piaget]. Moscow: Pedagogika
12. Galperin, P. Ia.,&,Kabylnitskaia S. L. (1974). Eksperimental'noe formirovanie vnimaniia [Experimental formation of attention]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGU
13. Haenen, J. (1996a). Piotr Galperin: Psychologist in Vygotsky's footsteps. New York: Nova Science
14. Haenen, J. (1996b). Piotr Galperin's criticism and extension of Lev Vygotsky's work. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 34(2), 54-60
15. Haenen, J., Schrijnemakers H.,&Stufkens, J. (2003). Sociocultural theory and the practice of teaching historical concepts. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, S. Miller, & V. Ageev (Eds.), Vygotsky's theory of education in cultural context (pp. 246-266). New York: Cambridge University Press
16. Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44(2), 7-83
17. Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
18. Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist 41(3), 264-274
19. Lave, J., &. Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
20. Leontiev, A. N. (1981).Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1959)
21. Minnis, M., & John-Steiner, V. P. (2001). Are we ready for a single, integrated theory? Human Development, 44(5), 296-310
22. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press
23. Siegler, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction, and the quest for meaning. In S. M. Carver&D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
24. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse- based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(3), 160-173
25. Van der Veer, R., & Arievitch, I. M. (1994). Reception of Galperin's ideas in the West. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 117-118
26. Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford, England: Blackwell
27. Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Internalization: Do we really need it? Human Development, 36, 168-171