Connectivity in specificational sentences

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 299-339

  Sharvit, Yael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043059714     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008390623435     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Akmajian, Adrian: 1970, 'On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudocleft Sentences', Linguistic Inquiry 1, 140-168.
2. Bach, Emmon: 1969, 'Anti-pronominalization', unpublished mimeograph, University of Texas.
3. Bach, Emmon and Barbara H. Partee: 1980, 'Anaphora and Semantic Structure', in J. Kreiman and A. Ojeda (eds.), CLS Parasession on Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 7-28.
4. Barss, Andrew: 1986, Chains and Anaphoric Dependence, PhD dissertation, MIT.
5. Beck, Sigrid and Hotze Rullmann: 1996, 'Degree Questions, Maximal Informativeness, and Exhaustivity', Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 97-101.
6. Bennet, Michael: 1979, Questions in Montague Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
7. Bittner, Maria: 1999, 'Concealed Causatives', Natural Language Semantics 7, 1-78.
8. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1991, 'Function WH and Weak Crossover', Proceedings of WCCFL 10, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 75-90.
9. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, 'Questions with Quantifiers', Natural Language Semantics 1, 181-234.
10. Cresti, Diana: 1995, 'Extraction and Reconstruction', Natural Language Semantics 3, 79-122.
11. Dahl, Östen: 1981, 'Binding Relations in Dislocated Constituents', talk presented at the Sloan Workshop on Alternatives to Transformational Grammar, Stanford University.
12. Dayal, Veneeta: 1996, Locality in WH Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. den Dikken, Marcel, Andre Meinunger, and Chris Wilder: 1998, 'Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis', ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 10, ZAS, Berlin.
14. Doron, Edit: 1982, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns', Texas Linguistics Forum 19, University of Texas, Austin, pp. 1-48.
15. Engdahl, Elisabet: 1986, Constituent Questions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
16. Fox, Danny: 1999, 'Reconstruction, Binding Theory and the Interpretation of Chains', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 157-196.
17. Freidin, Robert: 1986, 'Fundamental Issues in the Theory of Binding', in B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 151-188.
18. Geach, Peter T.: 1964, 'Referring Expressions Again', Analysis 24(5), 73-92.
19. Reprinted in P. Geach, Logic Matters, 1972, University of California Press, Berkeley.
20. Greenhoven, Veerle van: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, SfS-Report-03-96, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen, Germany.
21. Grimshaw, Jane: 1977, English Wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
22. Grodzinsky, Yosef and Tanya Reinhart: 1993, 'The Innateness of Binding and Coreference', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 69-101.
23. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of Wh-Complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 175-233.
24. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, Amsterdam.
25. Haïk, Isabelle: 1984, 'Indirect Binding', Linguistic Inquiry 15, 185-223.
26. Halvorsen, P. K.: 1978, The Syntax and Semantics of Cleft Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
27. Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, 'Questions in Montague English', Foundations of Language 10, 41-53.
28. Heim, Irene: 1979, 'Concealed Questions', in R. Bäuerle, U, Egli and A. von Stechow (eds.) Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 51-60.
29. Heim, Irene: 1994, 'Interrogative Complements of Know', Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse, The Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL1), pp. 128-144.
30. Heim, Irene: 1999, 'Notes on Superlatives', ms. MIT.
31. Heycock, Caroline: 1995, 'Asymmetries in Reconstruction', Linguistic Inquiry 26, 547-570.
32. Heycock, Caroline and Anthony Kroch: 1999, 'Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 365-397.
33. Higgins, Roger: 1973, The Pseudocleft Construction in English, PhD dissertation, MIT.
34. Jacobson, Pauline: 1994, 'Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences', in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV, Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 161-178.
35. Jacobson, Pauline: 1995, 'On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451-486.
36. Jacobson, Pauline: 1999, 'Towards a Variable-Free Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353-422.
37. Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
38. Krifka, Manfred: 1989, 'Boolean and Non-Boolean "and"', Ms., Tübingen and University of Texas at Austin.
39. Ladusaw, William: 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
40. Lahiri, Utpal: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them, PhD dissertation, MIT.
41. Landman, Fred: 1989, 'Groups, I', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559-605.
42. Lasersohn, Peter: 1998, 'Generalized Distributivity Operators', Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 83-93.
43. Lebeaux, David: 1988, Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
44. Lebeaux, David: 1990, 'Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation', Proceedings of NELS 20, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 318-332.
45. Linebarger, Marcia: 1987, 'Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 325-387.
46. Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.). Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303-323.
47. Łubowicz, Anna: 1998, 'Two Views of Polish Reflexives', ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
48. Partee, Barbara H.: 1986, 'Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous BE', in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 354-366.
49. Partee, Barbara H.: to appear, 'Copula Inversion Puzzles in English and Russian', in K. Dziwirek, H. Coats, and C. Vakareliyska (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7: The Seattle Meeting 1998, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor.
50. Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1983, 'Reflexives and Reciprocals in English: An Alternative to the Binding Theory', Proceedings of WCCFL 2, 189-203.
51. Pollard, Carl and Juan Sag: 1992, 'Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory', Linguistic Inquiry 23, 261-303.
52. Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, 'Coreference and Bound Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47-88.
53. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland: 1993, 'Reflexivity', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657-720.
54. Riemsdijk, Henk van and Edwin Williams: 1981, 'NP-Structure', The Linguistic Review 1, 171-217.
55. Robert, Craige: 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
56. Romero, Maribel: 1998, 'Problems for a Semantic Account of Scope Reconstruction', in G. Katz, S.-S. Kim, and H. Winhart (eds.), Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, pp. 127-153.
57. Ross, J. R.: 1972, 'Act', in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.
58. Ross, J. R.: 1997, 'That Is the Question', paper presented at the University of Pennyslvania.
59. Rullmann, Hotze: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
60. Schlenker, Philippe: 1998, Pseudocleft Connectivity and the Structure of Noun Phrases, ms., MIT.
61. Sharvit, Yael: 1996, 'Functional Dependencies and Indirect Binding', Proceedings of SALT VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 227-244.
62. Sharvit, Yael: 1997, The Syntax and Semantics of Functional Relative Clauses, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
63. Sharvit, Yael: to appear, 'Functional Relative Clauses', Linguistics and Philosophy.
64. Stechow, Arnim von: 1990, 'Layered Traces', paper presented at the Conference on Logic and Language, Revfülüp, Hungary.
65. Sternefeld, Wolfgang: 1997, 'The Semantics of Reconstruction and Connectivity', Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Universität Stuttgart and Tübingen, vol. 97.
66. Sternefeld, Wolfgang: 1998, 'The Proper Treatment of Binding in Pseudo-Cleft Constructions', in G. Katz, S.-S Kim, and H. Winhart (eds.), Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, pp. 39-58.
67. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1986, 'Comparative Superlatives', in N. Fukui et al. (eds)., Papers in Theoretical Linguistic, MITWPL 8, 266-280.
68. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1987, 'Bound Variables in Syntax: Are There Any', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, University of Amsterdam.
69. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, 'Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings', in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 311-347.
70. Williams, Edwin: 1983, 'Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories', Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 423-446.
71. Williams, Edwin: 1994, Thematic Structure in Syntax (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 23), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
72. Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.