Log-linear representations of the Mantel-Haenszel and the Breslow-Day tests

MPR-online

Volumn 5, Issue , 2000, Pages 13-30

  Von Eye, Alexander ^a   Indurkhya, Alka ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043059356     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Theory and Practice. New York: Wiley.
3. Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., & Holland, P.W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Breslow, N.E., & Day, N.E. (1980). Statistical methods in cancer research, 1. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
5. nd ed. New York: Springer.
6. Fidalgo, Á.M., Mellenbergh, G.J., & Muñiz, J. (1998). Comparación del procedimiento Mantel-Haenszel frente a los modelos loglineales en la detección del funcionamiento differencial de los ítems. Psicothema, 10, 209 - 218.
7. Gardiner, J., Pathak, D., & Indurkhya, A. (1999). Power calculations for detecting interaction in stratified 2 x 2 tables. Statistics and Probability Letters, 41, 267 - 275.
8. Graham, P. (1995). Modelling covariate effects in observer agreement studies: the case of nominal scale agreement. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 299 - 310.
9. Liang, K.Y., & Self, S.G. (1985). Tests of homogeneity of odds ratios when the data are sparse. Biometrics, 45, 171 - 181.
10. Lienert, G.A., Reynolds, J., & Wall, K.-D. (1979). Comparing associations in two independent fourfold tables. Biometrical Journal, 21, 473 - 491.
11. Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institutes, 22, 719 - 748.
12. Pathak, D.P. (1997). Breast cancer in women of Polish ancestry. Study funded by the National Cancer Institute.
13. th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14. nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press.
15. Vermunt, J. (1997). LEM, a general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg: Program Manual.
16. von Eye, A., & Spiel, C. (1996). Standard and non-standard log-linear symmetry models for measuring change in categorical variables. The American Statistician, 50, 300 - 305.
17. Wickens, T. (1989). Multivariate contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.