Is there any interaction effect between intention and perceived behavioral control?

MPR-online

Volumn 8, Issue , 2003, Pages 127-157

  Yang Wallentin, Fan ^a   Schmidt, Peter ^b   Davidov, Eldad ^b   Bamberg, Sebastian ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interaction effects; Latent variable scores; Maximum likelihood; Meta analysis; Robust maximum likelihood; Structural Equation Modeling; Theory of planned behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043056356     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: from cognitions to behaviors (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
3. Ajzen, I (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1-20.
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 40-52.
7. Allen, J., Davis, D., & Soskin, M. (1993). Using coupon incentives in recycling aluminum: A market approach to energy conservation policy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27, 300-318.
8. Allison, P. D. (1977). Testing for interaction in multiple regression. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 144-153.
9. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. In proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium, volume V. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS User's Guide 4.0. Chicago: Smallwaters.
11. Arminger, G., & Muthen, B. O. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63, 271-300.
12. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
13. Bagozzi, R. P, Baumgarthner H., & Yi, Y. (1992). State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: an application to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 505-517.
14. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis. Psychology and Marketing, 11, 313-340.
15. Baumgartner, H., & Baggozi, R. P. (1995). Specification, estimation and testing of moment structure models based on latent variates involving interactions among the exogenous constructs. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 187-213.
16. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285-301.
17. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
18. Bollen, K. A. (1995). Structural equation models that are non-linear in latent variables: A theory and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563-592.
19. Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Two-stage least squares estimation of interaction effects. In R. E. Schumacker, & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation models (pp. 125-151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
21. Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1993). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549-562.
22. Conner, M., & Armitage, J. C. (1998). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464.
23. De Vellis, B. M., Blalock, S. J., & Sandler, R. S. (1990). Predicting participation in cancer screening: The role of perceived behavioral control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 639-660.
24. Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 754-765.
25. Dzewaltowski, D. A., Noble, J. M., & Shaw, J. M. (1990). Physical activity participation-social cognitive theory versus the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 388-405.
26. Eagly, A. E., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. East, R. (1993). Investment decisions and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 337-375.
28. Goldenhar, L. M., & Connell, C. M. (1992-93). Understanding and predicting recycling behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Environmental Systems, 22, 91-103.
29. Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in Covariance structure modeling. An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 26(3), 329-367.
30. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348-357.
32. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park: Sage.
33. Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger, & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85-112). New York: Seminar.
34. Jöreskog, K. G. (1998). Interaction and Nonlinear Modeling: Issues and Approaches. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 239-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Jöreskog, K. G. (2000). Latent variable scores and their uses. Scientific Software International. Retrieved August, 2003 from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/column6.htm
36. Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D., du Toit, S., & du Toit, M. (2000). LISREL 8: New Statistical Features (3rd ed.). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
37. Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling issues and techniques (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Jones, R. E. (1990). Understanding paper recycling in an institutionally supportive setting: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Environmental Systems, 19, 307-321.
39. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210.
40. Kimiecik, J. (1992). Predicting vigorous physical activity of corporate employees: Comparing the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 192-206.
41. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimates of latent interaction effects with the LMS-method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457-474.
42. Klein, A., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Frank, D. (1997). A new approach to the estimation of latent interaction effects in structural equation models. In W. Bandilla & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Softstat 97: Advances in statistical software (pp. 479-486). Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius.
43. Lee, S. Y., & Zhu, H. T. (2000). Statistical analysis of non-linear structural equation models with continuous and polytomous data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 209-232.
44. Li Fuzhong, Harmer, P., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Acock, A., & Boles, S. (1998). Approaches to testing interaction effects using structural equation modeling methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 1-39.
45. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
46. Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2001). New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. McArdle, J. J., & Ghisletta, P. (2000). The future of latent variable modeling with interactions and nonlinearity. APA Review of Books 2000, 1(45), 91-95.
48. Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Klein, A. (1997). Methodological problems of estimating latent interaction effects. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2(2), 95-111. Retrieved August, 2003 from http://www.mpr-online.de
49. Morojele, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1994). Addictive behaviors: predictors of abstine intentions and expectations in the theory of planned behavior. In D. R. Rutter & L. Quine (Eds.), Social psychology and health: European perspectives (pp. 47-70). Aldershot, England UK: Avebury/Ashgate Publishing Co.
50. Moulder, B. M., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1-19.
51. Ping, R. A. (1996). Latent variable regression: a technique for estimating interaction and quadratic coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 95-120.
52. Ping, R. A. (1998). EQS and LISREL examples using survey data. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 239-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Prislin, R., & Kovrlija, N. (1992). Predicting behavior of high and low self-monitors- an application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychological Reports, 70, 1131-1138.
54. Reinecke, J. (2002). Nonlinear structural equation models with the theory of planned behavior: comparison of multiple group and latent product term analyses. Quality and Quantity, 36, 93-112.
55. Reinecke, J., Schmidt, P., & Ajzen, I. (1996). Application of the theory of planned behavior to adolescents' condom use: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 749-772.
56. Saris, W. E. (2001). Measurement models in sociology and political science. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.) Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 97-115). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
57. Satorra, A. (1993) Multi-sample analysis of moment structures: Asymptotic validity of inferences based on second-order moments. In K. Haagen, D. J. Bartholomew & M. Deistler (Eds.), Statistical Modeling and Latent Variables (pp. 283-298). Elsevier Science Publishers.
58. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a Latent Moderated Structural Equations Approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Scherpenzeel, A. C., & Saris, W. E. (1997). The validity and reliability of survey questions. Sociological Methods and Research, 25, 347-83.
60. Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 843-851.
61. Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modelling, 9(1), 40-54.
62. Schumacker, R. E. & Marcoulides, G. A. (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Spiegel-Documentation (1993). Cars, Traffic and Environment. Hamburg: Augstein GmbH.
64. Terry, D. J. and O'Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: the effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199-220.
65. Theodorakis, Y. (1994). Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 8, 149-165.
66. Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In H. E. Howe & M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979 (pp.195-259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
67. Van den Putte, B. (1991). On the Theory of Reasoned Action. [Unpublished dissertation]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
68. Van den Putte, B., & Hoogstraten, J. (1997). Applying structural equation modeling in the context of the theory of reasoned action: some problems and solutions. Structural equation modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(4), 320-337.
69. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2000). Estimation for polytomial structural equation models. Journal of the American statistical association, 95, 929-940.
70. White, K. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1994). Safer sex behavior: the role of attitudes, norms, and control factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2164-2192.
71. Yang-Jonsson, F. (1997). Non-linear structural equation models. Simulation studies of the Kenny-Judd model. Stockholm: Gotab.
72. Yang-Wallentin, F., & Jöreskog, K. G. (2001) Robust standard errors and Chi-Squares for interaction models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New development and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 159-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Yang-Wallentin, F., Schmidt, P., & Bamberg, S. (2001). Testing interactions with three different methods in the theory of planned behavior: analysis of traffic behavior data. In R. Cudeck, S., du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: present and future (pp. 405-424). USA: Scientific Software International, Inc.
74. Zhu, H. T., & Lee, S. Y (1999). Statistical analysis of nonlinear factor analysis models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 225-242.