Factors that influence intelligibility in multitalker speech displays

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 313-334

  Ericson, Mark A ^a   Brungart, Douglas S ^a   Simpson, Brian D ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043053694     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap1403_6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abouchacra, K., Tran, T., Besing, J., & Koehnke, J. (1997, February). Performance on a selective attention task as a function of stimulus presentation mode. In Proceedings of the Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida.
2. American National Standards Institute. (1969). ANSI 53.5-1969: Methods for calculation of the articulation index. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
3. Assman, P. F., & Summerfield, Q. (1990). Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 680-697.
4. Begault, D. R. (1999). Virtual acoustic displays for teleconferencing: Intelligibility advantage for "telephone-grade" audio. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 47, 824-828.
5. Bolia, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Ericson, M. A., & Simpson, B. D. (2000). A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1065-1066.
6. Bronkhorst, A., & Plomp, R. (1988). The effect of head-induced interaural time and level difference on speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1508-1516.
7. Brungart, D. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101-1109.
8. Brungart, D., & Simpson, B. (2001). Optimizing multitalker speech displays with near-field HRTFs. In J. Hiipakka, N. Zacharov, & T. Takala (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 169-174). Espoo, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing and the Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Laboratory.
9. Brungart, D., Simpson, B., Ericson, M., & Scott, K. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527-2538.
10. Carhart, R., Tillman, T., & Johnson, K. (1967). Release from masking for speech through interaural time delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 124-138.
11. Crispien, K., & Ehrenberg, T. (1995). Evaluation of the "cocktail party effect" for multiple speech stimuli within a spatial audio display. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 43, 932-940.
12. Drullman, R., & Bronkhorst, A. (2000). Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2224-2235.
13. Egan, J., Carterette, E., & Thwing, E. (1954). Factors affecting multi-channel listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 774-782.
14. Ericson, M., & McKinley, R. (1997). The intelligibility of multiple talkers spatially separated in noise. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 701-724). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Kryter, K. (1962). Methods for calculation and use of the Articulation Index. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1689-1697.
16. Mills, A. (1958). On the minimum audible angle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 237-246.
17. Moore, T. (1981). Voice communication jamming research. In AGARD Conference Proceedings 331: Aural communication in aviation (pp. 2:1-2:6). Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: PUBLISHER NAME.
18. Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L. (1999). Spatial audio displays for speech communication. A comparison of free-field and virtual sources. In Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1202-1205). LOCATION: PUBLISHER NAME
19. Spieth, W., Curtis, J., & Webster, J. (1954). Responding to one of two simultaneous messages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 391-396.
20. Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T. (1980). A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 318-326.
21. Tun, P., & Wingfield, A. (1994). Speech recall under heavy load conditions: Age, predictability and limits on dual-task interference. Aging, Neuroscience, and Cognition, 1, 29-44.
22. U.S. Department of Defense. (1998). MIL-STD-1472E, Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23. Wenzel, E., Arruda, M., Kistler, D., & Wightman, F. (1993). Localization using non-individualized head-related transfer functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 111-123.