Yes, there is a preferential detection of negative stimuli: A response to labiouse

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 571-572

  Dijksterhuis, Ap ^a   Corneille, Olivier ^b,c   Aarts, Henk ^d   Vermeulen, Nicolas ^b   Luminet, Olivier ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REVIEW;

AFFECT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY;

EID: 4043048743     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00721.x     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Corneille, O., Vermeulen, N., Luminet, O., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). A closer examination of the Asymmetrical Lexical-Affective Dissociation Hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of negative stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 14-18.
3. Labiouse, C.L. (2004). Is there a real preferential detection of negative stimuli? A comment on Dijksterhuis and Aarts (2003). Psychological Science, 15, 364-365.