Surgical treatment of hallux valgus and forefoot deformities in Sweden: A population-based study

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 298-304

  Saro, Carlos ^a,b   Bengtsson, Ann Sophie ^a   Lindgren, Urban ^a   Adami, Johanna ^a   Blomqvist, Paul ^a   Felländer Tsai, Li ^a  

^a Division of Orthopaedics ^*

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Epidemiological study; Forefoot surgery; Hallux valgus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT MALFORMATION; FOREFOOT; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HOSPITAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; REGISTER; SEX DIFFERENCE; SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HALLUX VALGUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PREVALENCE; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 40349096600     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0298     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Benvenuti, F; Ferrucci, L; Guralnik, JM; Gangemi, S; Baroni, A: Foot pain and disability in older persons: an epidemiologic survey. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 43:479-484, 1995.
2. Black, JR; Hale, WE: Prevalence of foot complaints in the elderly. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 77:308-311, 1987.
3. Coughlin, MJ; Thompson, FM: The high price of high-fashion footwear. Instr. Course Lect. 44:371-377, 1995.
4. Creer, WS: The feet of the industrial worker: clinical aspect; relation to footwear. Lancet. 2:1482, 1938.
5. Dunn, JE; Link, CL; Felson, DT; et al.: Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 159:491-498, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh071
6. Frey, C. Foot health and shoewear for women. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 372:32-44, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200003000-00005
7. Frey, C; Thompson, F; Smith, J: Update on women's footwear. Foot Ankle Int. 16:328-331, 1995.
8. Frey, C; Thompson, F; Smith, J; Sanders, M; Horstman, H: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society women's shoe survey. Foot Ankle. 14:78-81, 1993.
9. Garrow, AP; Silman, AJ; Macfarlane, GJ: The Cheshire Foot Pain and Disability Survey: a population survey assessing prevalence and associations. Pain. 110:378-384, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.019
10. Gorter, KJ; Kuyvenhoven, MM; de Melker, RA: Nontraumatic foot complaints in older people. A population-based survey of risk factors, mobility, and well-being. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 90:397-402, 2000.
11. Gould, N; Schneider, W; Ashikaga, T: Epidemiological survey of foot problems in the continental United States: 1978-1979. Foot Ankle. 1:8-10, 1980.
12. Hewitt, D; Stewart, AM; Webb, JW: The prevalence of foot defects among wartime recruits. Br. Med. J. 4839:745-749, 1953.
13. Hoffman, P: Conclusions drawn from a comparative study of the feet of barefooted and shoe-wearing peoples. Am. J. Orthop. Surg. 3:105-136, 1905.
14. Kato, T; Watanabe, S: The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. Clin. Orthop. 157:78-81, 1981.
15. Leveille, SG; Guralnik, JM; Ferrucci, L; et al.: Foot pain and disability in older women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148:657-665, 1998.
16. Menz, HB; Morris, ME: Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 51:346-351, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1159/000086373
17. National Board of Health and Welfare: Swedish Classification of Operations and Major Procedures. Revised version of 2004 http://www. socialstyrelsen.se/Publicerat/2004/8608/2004-4-1.htm [accessed February] 2007.
18. National Board of Health and Welfare: Quality of data and underreporting. Available at: http://www.sos.se/epc/english/ParEng.htm 2002.
19. Nilsson, AC; Spetz, CL; Carsjo, K; Nightingale, R; Smedby, B: Relability of the Hospital Registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation. Lakartidningen. 598:603-605, 1994.
20. NKO: Medical indications for foot and ankle surgery. Swedish National Competence Centre for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Swedish. http://www.nko.se. Lund 2006 pp 12-14.
21. Platte, MJ; O'Connell, PG; Hicks, JE; Gerber, LH: The relationship of pain and deformity of the rheumatoid foot to gait and an index of functional ambulation. J. Rheumatol. 18:38-43, 1991.
22. Sim-Fook, L; Hodgson, AR: A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 40-A: 1058-1062, 1958.
23. Spetz, CL; Carlsson, CL; Engqvist, M; et al.: [Reintroduction of social security numbers gives better basis for evaluation. The patient registry is open for research]. Lakartidningen. 93:1844-1847, 1996.
24. World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. Version for 2006. http://www3.who.int/icd/currentversion/fr-icd.htm [accessed February 2007].