Fitness/competency to stand trial: A conceptual overview, review of existing instruments, and cross-validation of the nussbaum fitness questionnaire

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-72

  Nussbaum, David ^a,c   Hancock, Megan ^a   Turner, Ian ^d   Arrowood, John ^b   Melodick, Sheldon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^c Twin Towers Correctional Facility   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40349094581     PISSN: 14743310     EISSN: 14743329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brief-treatment/mhm026     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akinkunmi, A. A. (2002). The MacArthur competence assessment tool-fitness to please: A preliminary evaluation of a research instrument for assessing fitness to plead in England and Wales. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 30, 476-482.
2. Appelbaum, K., Fisher, W., Nestelbaum, S., & Bateman, A. (1992). Are pretrial commitments for forensic evaluation used to control nuisance behavior? Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 443, 603-607.
3. Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Moed Katan, 3b. Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 10, 291-316.
4. Borkowski, J. G., Benton, A. L., & Spreen, O. (1967). Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 5(2), 135-140.
5. Chaimowitz, G. A., & Ferencz, J. (1999) Cost savings associated with fitness-to-stand-trial assessments in detention centres: A pilot program. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(8), 808-810.
6. Coles, E. M., Freitas, T. T., & Tweed, R. (1996). Assessment of understanding by people manifesting mental retardation: A preliminary report. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 83, 187-192.
7. Cooper, D. K., & Grisso, T. (1997). Five year research update (1991-1995): Evaluations for competency to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15, 347-364.
8. Criminal Code of Canada (C.C.C.), 1993.
9. Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
10. Everington, C. (1990). The competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with mental retardations (CAST-MR): A validation study. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 17(2), 147-168.
11. Everington, C., & Dunn, C. (1995). A second validation of the competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with mental retardation (CAST-MR). Criminal Justice & Behaviour, 22(1), 44-59.
12. Everington, C., & Luckasson, R. (1989). Addressing the needs of the criminal defendant with mental retardation: The special educator as a resource to the criminal justice system. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 24(3), 193-200.
13. Farkas, G. M., DeLeon, P. H., & Newman, R. (1997). Sanity examiner certification: An evolving national agenda. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 28(1), 73-76.
14. Geller, J., Fisher, W., & Kaye, N. (1991). Effect of evaluations of competency to stand trial on the state hospital in an era of increased community services. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 42, 818-823.
15. Godinez v. Moran, 113, S. Ct. 2680 (1993).
16. Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum Press.
17. Gutheil, T. G. (1999). A confusion of tongues: Insanity, psychiatry and the law. Psychiatric Services, 50(6), 767-773.
18. Hayes, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19. Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool: Criminal adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20. Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., & Delis, D. (1991). WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
21. Kirkish, P., & Sreenivasan, S. (1999). Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: A practical conceptual model. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 27(1), 101-113.
22. Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. (eds.). (1994). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics 1993. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. May, R. B., & Hunter, M. A. (1993). Some advantages of permutation tests. Canadian Psychology, 34(4), 410-406.
24. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Nestor, P. G., Daggett, D., Haycock, J., & Price, M. (1999). Competence to stand trial: A neuropsychological inquiry. Law & Human Behaviour, 23(4), 397-412.
26. Nicholson, R. A., & Kugler, K. E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: A quantitative review of comparative research. Psychological Bulletin, 10(3), 355-370.
27. Nussbaum, D., Mamak, M., Tremblay, H., Wright, P., & Callaghan, J. (1998). The METFORS fitness questionnaire (MFQ): A self-report measure for screening competency to stand trial. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16(3), 41-64.
28. Nussbaum, D. (2006). Recommending probation and parole. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 426-483). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Otto, R. K., Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R. A., Edens, J. F., Monahan, J., Bonnie, R. J., et al. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 10(4), 435-443.
30. Overall, J. E., & Gornham, D. R. (1962). The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799-812.
31. Powell, D. H., Kaplan, E. F., Whitla, D., Catlin, R., & Funkenstein, H. H. (1993). MicroCog: Assessment of cognitive function. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
32. Poythress, N., Nicholson, Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., et al. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool: Criminal adjudication [professional manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
33. Regina v. Taylor, 77, C.C.C. (3d) 551 (Ont. C.A.) (1992).
34. Roesch, R., Ogloff, J. R. P., Hart, S. D., & Dempster, R. J. (1997). The impact of Canadian criminal code changes on remands and assessments of fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(5), 509-514.
35. Roesch, R., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1984). The fitness interview test: A methodfor assessing fitness to stand trial. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Centre of Criminology.
36. Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., Eaves, D., & Webster, C. D. (1998). The fitness interview test (Rev. ed.). Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health Law and Policy Institute.
37. Rogers, R. (2001). Focused forensic interviews. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing (pp. 296-337). New York: Guilford.
38. Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment resources.
39. Rogers, R., Grandjean, N., Tillbrook, C. E., Vitacco, M. J., & Sewell, K. W. (2001). Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: A critical review augmented with research data. Behaviour Sciences & the Law, 19, 503-518.
40. Rogers, R., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., & Harrison, K. S. (2004). An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial. Psychological Assessment, 16(2), 139-145.
41. Rogers, R., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., Tillbrook, C. E., & Martin, M. A. (2003). Assessing dimensions of competency to stand trial: Construct validations of the ECST-R. Assessment, 10(4), 344-351.
42. Rogers, R., & Mitchel, C. N. (1991). CN: Mental health experts and the criminal courts: A handbook for lawyers and clinicians. Toronto, Canada: Carswell Company Ltd.
43. Sanford, J. A., & Turner, A. (1994). The integrated visual and auditory (IVA) continuous performance task and professional manual. Richmond, VA: Brain Train.
44. Schneider, R. (1996). Mental disorder in the courts. Retrieved March 26, 2007, from http://www.criminallawyers.ca/newslett/oct.96/ 07SCHNEI.HTM/.
45. Sigelman, C. K., Winer, J. L., & Schoenrock, C. J. (1982). The responsiveness of mentally retarded persons to questions. Educations and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17(2), 120-124.
46. Skeem, J. L., Golding, S. L., Cohn, N. B., & Berge, G. (1998). Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law & Human Behavior, 22(5), 519-547.
47. Smith, S. A. (1993). Confusing the terms "guilty" and "not guilty": Implications for alleged offenders with mental retardation. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 675-678.
48. Veiel, H. O. F., & Coles, E. M. (1999). Measuring unfitness to stand trial: Psychological analysis of a legal issue. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 356-361.
49. Viljoen, J., Rosesch, R., & Zapf, P. (2002). Interrater reliability of the fitness interview test across 4 professional groups. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(10), 945-952.
50. Vi1joen, J., Vincent, G. M., & Roesch, R. (2006). Assessing adolescent defendants' adjucative competence: Interrater reliability and factor structure of the fitness interview test-revised. Criminal Justice & Behaviour, 33(4), 467-487.
51. Wright, P., & Stuss, D. (1992). The common item estimation task. Unpublished document. Toronto, Canada: Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care.
52. Zachary, R. A. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scales. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
53. Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (1997). Assessing fitness to stand trial: A comparison of institution-based evaluations and a brief screening interview. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 16, 53-66.
54. Zapf, P.A., & Roesch, R. (2001). A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 24, 81-92.