Normative SF-36 values in competing NCAA intercollegiate athletes differ from values in the general population

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 471-476

  Huffman, G Russell ^a   Park, Jung ^b   Roser Jones, Chris ^b   Sennett, Brian J ^a   Yagnik, Gautum ^a   Webner, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 40349084427     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00325     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J.E. Ware Jr. C.D. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 1992 473 483
2. C. Jenkinson A. Coulter L. Wright Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age BMJ 306 1993 1437 1440
3. R.D. Hays L.S. Morales The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life Ann Med 33 2001 350 357
4. J.E. Ware M. Kosinski J.E. Dewey How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey 2000 QualityMetric Lincoln, RI
5. I. McDowell Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires 3rd 2006 Oxford University Press New York
6. J. Alonso E. Regidor G. Barrio L. Prieto C. Rodríguez L. de la Fuente [Population reference values of the Spanish version of the Health Questionnaire SF-36] Med Clin (Barc) 111 1998 410 416 Spanish
7. Y. Demiral G. Ergor B. Unal S. Semin Y. Akvardar B. Kivircik K. Alptekin Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population BMC Public Health 6 2006 247
8. A. Bowling M. Bond C. Jenkinson D.L. Lamping Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey J Public Health Med 21 1999 255 270
9. U. Ellert B.M. Bellach The SF-36 in the Federal Health Survey—description of a current normal sample Gesundheitswesen 61 1999 S184 S190
10. D.R. McAllister A.R. Motamedi S.L. Hame M.S. Shapiro F.J. Dorey Quality of life assessment in elite collegiate athletes Am J Sports Med 29 2001 806 810
11. F.G. Hunsaker D.A. Cioffi P.C. Amadio J.G. Wright B. Caughlin The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 2002 208 215
12. G.R. Huffman A.M. Bagley M.A. James J.A. Lerman G. Rab Assessment of children with brachial plexus birth palsy using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument J Pediatr Orthop 25 2005 400 404
13. J.E. Ware Jr. M. Kosinski S.K. Keller SF-36 physical and mental health survey scales: a user's manual 1994 The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston
14. J.E. Ware Jr. K.K. Snow M. Kosinski B. Gandek SF-36 health survey manual interpretation guide 1993 The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston
15. J.E. Brazier R. Harper N.M. Jones A. O'Cathain K.J. Thomas T. Usherwood L. Westlake Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care BMJ 305 1992 160 164
16. L.J. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 16 1951 297 334
17. J.C. Wang M.S. Shapiro J.D. Hatch J. Knight F.J. Dorey R.B. Delamarter The outcome of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes Spine 24 1999 570 573
18. D.R. McAllister A.M. Tsai J.L. Dragoo J. McWilliams F.J. Dorey S.L. Hame G.A. Finerman Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite collegiate athletes Am J Sports Med 31 2003 560 563