Modeling students' intention to adopt e-learning a case from Egypt

Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 157-168

  Abdel Wahab, Ahmed Gad ^a,b,c  

^a Mansoura University   (Egypt)

^b NONE   (Egypt)

^c MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Adoption; E learning; Eases of use; Innovation; Usage; Usefulness

Indexed keywords

EID: 40249106574     PISSN: 13026488     EISSN: 13026488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdel-Wahab A. (2007), Management, Available at: http://ahmed-abdel- wahab.blogspot.com
2. Azjen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Beckstrom, M, Croasdale, H, Riad S M, Kamel M M, 2004, "Assessment of Egypt's E-learning Readiness", Available at: http://www.ltssw.bris.ac. uk/events/egypt/ellen/readiness.doc.
4. Conrad, K & TrainningLinks 2000, instruction design for web-based training. Amherst: HRD Press.
5. Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
6. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warsaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptanceof computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
7. Fayek, M., 2004, "E-Learning and its Application in Egypt", a presentation made at Aachen University of Technology,Germany.
8. Fishbein, M., and Azjen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. st century: a framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
10. Govindasamy, T, 2002. Successful implementation of e-learning: pedagogical considerations, Internet and Higher Education 4:287-299.
11. Hill, T., Smith, N. D., and Mann, M. F. (1987), Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: A case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-318.
12. Kamel S and Wahba K (2003) The Use of a Hybrid Model in Web-Based Education: The Global Campus Project in Web-Based Education: Learning From Experience, edited by Anil Aggarwal, Hershey: Information Science Publishing, pp. 331-346.
13. MacDonald, C 3, Stodel, E 3, Fames, L G, Breithaupt, K, Gabriel, M A. the demand-driven learning model: a framework for web-based learning. The Internet and Higher Education 4(2001)
14. Mansoura University E learning unit 2006, available at: http://mansvu.mans.edu.eg/index.php
15. Mathieson, K, (1991). Predicting user intention: Comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior. Information systems Research, 2, 173-191.
16. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, E-learning in tertiary education, available at: http;//www.oecd.org
17. Parikh, M & Verma, S 2002, 'Utilizing Internet technologies to support learning: an empirical analysis', International Journal of Information Management, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 27-46.
18. Pavri, F. (1988). "An empirical investigation of the factors contributing to micro-computer usage", dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
19. Rosenberg, M J, 2001. E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age, New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Sheppard,B. H., Hartwick, J.,& Warsaw, P. R.(1988). The Theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendation for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.
21. Zemsky, R., Massy,W., Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why, The learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from: http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/WeatherStation.html.