Phase diagram of an Ising model with competitive interactions on a Husimi tree and its disordered counterpart

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 387, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2777-2792

  Ostilli, M ^a,b   Mukhamedov, F ^a   Mendes, J F F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b Center for Statistical Mechanics and Complexity (INFM CNR)   (Italy)

Author keywords

Competing Ising models; Glass transition; Husumi trees

Indexed keywords

DIMERS; ISING MODEL; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; SPIN GLASS;

FINITE TEMPERATURE; RANDOM MODELS;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 40249102979     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.071     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baxter R.J. Exact Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (1982), Academic Press, London See also Sec. 2 of the Ref. [34]
2. Dorogovtsev S.N., and Mendes J.F.F. Evolution of Networks (2003), University Press, Oxford
3. Pastor-Satorras R., and Vespignani A. Evolution and Structure of the Internet (2004), University Press, Cambridge
4. Albert R., and Barabasi A.L. Rev. Modern Phys. 74 (2002) 47
5. Dorogovtsev S.N., and Mendes J.F.F. Adv. Phys. 51 (2002) 1079
6. Dorogovtsev S.N., Goltsev A.V., and Mendes J.F.F. Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) 016104
7. Leone M., Vazquez A., Vespignani A., and Zecchina R. Eur. Phys. J. B 28 (2002) 191
8. Lyons R. Comm. Math. Phys. 125 (1989) 337-353
9. Lyons R. J. Math. Phys. 41 3 (2000) 1099-1126
10. Kim D.-H., Rodgers G.J., Kahng B., and Kim D. Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 056115
11. Ostilli M. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P10005
12. da Silva C.R., and Coutinho S. Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 7975-7985
13. Monroe J. J. Stat. Phys. 65 (1991) 255
14. Monroe J. J. Stat. Phys. 67 (1992) 1185
15. Monroe J. Physica A 256 (1998) 217
16. Monroe J. Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001) 016126
17. Monroe J. Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 026109
18. Ganikhodjaev N.N., Pah C.H., and Wahiddin M.R.B. J.Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 (2003) 4283-4289
19. Ganikhodjaev N.N., Pah C.H., and Wahiddin M.R.B. J. Math. Phys. 45 (2004) 3645
20. Mukhamedov F., and Rozikov U. J. Stat. Phys. 114 (2004) 825
21. Mukhamedov F., and Rozikov U. J. Stat. Phys. 119 (2005) 427
22. Ganikhodjaev N., Mukhamedov F., and Mendes J.F.F. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P08012
23. F. Mukhamedov, U. Rozikov. math-ph/0510022
24. Domb C. Adv. Phys. 9 (1960) 145
25. S.N. Dorogovtsev, A.V. Goltsev, J.F.F. Mendes, Critical phenomena in complex networks. arXiv:0705.0010v2
26. Vannimenus J. Z.Phys. B 43 (1981) 141-148 We point out that, unlike the simpler models faced in the Refs. [14-18], the approaches used for the models considered in Refs. [22-26] were analytical only partially and, in particular, a general and rigorous picture of the phase diagrams was lacking
27. Horiguchi T., and Morita T. J. Phys. A 16 (1983) 3611
28. Mariz M., Tsalis C., and Albuquerque A.L. J. Stat. Phys. 40 (1985) 577-592
29. Yokoi C.S.O., de Oliveira M.J., and Salinas S.R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 163-166
30. Tragtenberg M.H.R., and Yokoi C.S.O. Phys. Rev. E 52 (1995) 2187-2197
31. Elliott R.J. Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 340-345
32. Bak P., and von Boehm J. Phys. Rev. B 21 (1980) 5297-5308
33. Toulouse G. Comm. Phys. 2 (1977) 115
34. Mezard M., Parisi G., and Virasoro M.A. Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (1987), World Scientific, Singapore
35. Ostilli M. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P10004
36. Ostilli M. J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P09010
37. Mélin R., and Peysson S. Eur. Phys. J. B 14 (2000) 169
38. Mezard M., and Parisi G. Eur. Phys. J. B 20 (2001) 217-233
39. Likos C.N. Phys. Rev. E 55 (1997) see also references therein
40. Bianconi G., and Marsili M. J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P06005
41. Montanari A., and Rizzo T. J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P10011
42. Parisi G., and Slanina F. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) L02003
43. Marinari E., and Semerjian G. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P06019
44. Chertkov M., and Chernyak V.Y. J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P06009
45. Eggarter T.P. Phys. Rev. B 9 (1973) 2989
46. Müller-Hartman E., and Zittartz J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 893
47. Peruggi F. J. Phys. A 16 (1983) L713
48. Due to this similarity with a glassy phase, we could alternatively use the expression "liquid of dimers" instead of "gas of dimers" for this phase. Of course such a distinction for our model is just a lexical fact.
49. l1, l2 (l), so that the sufficient condition can be directly verified looking at the distribution p (l).