System identification applied to long-span cable-supported bridges using seismic records

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 361-386

  Siringoringo, Dionysius M ^a   Fujino, Yozo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cable supported bridge; Instrumented bridge; MIMO system identification; Seimic response; State space realization

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIMO SYSTEMS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STATE SPACE METHODS;

INSTRUMENTED BRIDGE; MIMO SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION; STATE-SPACE REALIZATION;

CABLE STAYED BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; CORRELATION; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MATRIX; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SENSOR; VIBRATION;

EID: 40249100493     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.758     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1 Fujino Y, Kikkawa H, Namikawa K, Mizoguchi T. Seismic retrofit design of long‐span bridges on metropolitan expressways in Tokyo. Proceeding of the 6th International Bridge Engineering Conference, Transportation Research Board, Boston Mass, U.S.A., 2005.
2. 2 Abdel‐Ghaffar AM, Scanlan RH. Ambient vibration studies of the Golden Gate Bridge: I. Suspended structure. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1985 ; 111 (4): 463–482.
3. 3 Abdel‐Ghaffar M, Scanlan RH. Ambient vibration studies of the Golden Gate Bridge: II. Pier tower structure. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1985 ; 111 (4): 483–499.
4. 4 Aktan AE, Catbas N, Turer A, Zhang Z. Structural identification: analytical aspect. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998 ; 124 (7): 817–829.
5. 5 Aktan AE, Farhey DN. Structural identification for condition assessment: experimental arts. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997 ; 123 (11): 1674–1684.
6. 6 Brownjohn JM, Dumanoglu AA, Severn RT, Blakeborough A. Ambient vibration survey of the Bosporous suspension bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1989 ; 18: 263–283.
7. 7 Nagayama T, Abe M, Fujino Y, Ikeda K. Structural identification of non‐proportionally damped systems and its application to a full scale suspension bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2005 ; 131 (10): 1536–1545.
8. 8 Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. System identification of a suspension bridge from ambient vibration response. Engineering Structures, in press, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.004.
9. 9 Werner SD, Beck JL, Levine MB. Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road Overpass using 1979 imperial Valley Earthquake Records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1987 ; 15: 249–274.
10. 10 Chaudhary MTA, Abe M, Fujino Y, Yoshida J. System identification of two base‐isolated bridges using seismic records. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000 ; 126 (10): 1181–1194.
11. 11 Arici Y, Mosalam KM. System identification of instrumented bridge systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003 ; 32: 999–1020.
12. 12 Smyth AW, Jin‐Song P, Masri SF. System identification of the Vincent Thomas suspension bridge using earthquake records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003 ; 32 (3): 339–367.
13. 13 Pridham BA, Wilson JC. Identification of based‐excited structures using output‐only parameter estimation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004 ; 33 (1): 133–155.
14. 14 Lus B, Betti R, Longman RW. Identification of linear structural system using earthquake‐induced record. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999 ; 28: 1449–1467.
15. 15 Juang JN. System realization using information matrix. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 1997 ; 20 (3): 492–500.
16. 16 Juang JN. State‐space system realization with input‐and‐output‐data correlation. NASA Technical Paper 3622, April 1997.
17. 17 Arici Y, Mosalam KM. Modal identification of bridge system using state‐space method. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2005 ; 12: 381–404.
18. 18 Fleming JF, Egeseli EA. Dynamic behavior of a cable‐stayed bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1980 ; 8: 1–16.
19. 19 Clough RW, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures (2nd edn). McGraw‐Hill: New York, 597–600.
20. 20 Juang JN, Pappa RS. Effects of noise on modal parameters identified by Eigensystem Realization Algorithm. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 1986 ; 9: 294–303.
21. 21 The Yokohama Bay Bridge. Published by the Metropolitan Expressway Public Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, 1991 ; 164–172 (in Japanese).
22. 22 Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Dynamic characteristics of a curved cable‐stayed bridge identified from strong motion record. Engineering Structures 2007 ; 29 (8): 2001–2017.
23. 23 Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Observed dynamic performance of the Yokohama Bay Bridge from system identification using seismic records. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006 ; 13 (1): 226–244.
24. 24 Izumi K, Odagiri N, Ogiwara M, Yabe J, Ochiai M, Ohgaki K, Watanabe Y. Vibration test for a two hinge‐double deck suspension bridge. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineering 1994 ; 40A: 721–733 (in Japanese).
25. 25 Yamaguchi H, Takano H, Ogasawara M, Shimosato T, Kato M, Okada J. Identification of dynamic characteristics by field vibration test in Tsurumi Tsubasa Bridge. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineering 1996 ; 543: 247–258 (in Japanese).