A review of adverse effects of damping in seismic isolation

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 447-465

  Politopoulos, Ioannis ^a  

^a CEA SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Damping; Floor spectra; Friction; Seismic isolation

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FRICTION; HYSTERESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

FLOOR SPECTRA; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SHEAR FORCE;

SEISMIC RESPONSE;

DAMPING; DISPLACEMENT; FRICTION; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 40249093196     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.763     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. 1 Tsai HS, Kelly J. Seismic response of heavily damped base isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993 ; 22: 633–645.
2. 2 Kelly JM. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999 ; 28: 3–20.
3. 3 Constantinou M. Seismic isolation systems: introduction and an overview. In Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering, Soong TT, Constantinou M (eds). Springer: Berlin, 1994 ; 81–96.
4. 4 Winters CW, Constantinou M. Evaluation of static and response spectrum analysis procedures of SEAOC/UBC for seismic isolated structures. Report No. NCEER‐93‐0004, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, 1993.
5. 5 Hall J. Discussion. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999 ; 28: 1717–1720.
6. 6 Hall JF, Keri LR. Isolated buildings and the 1997 UBC near‐source factors. Earthquake Spectra 2000 ; 16 (2): 393–411.
7. 7 Pinto PE, Vanzi I. Base isolation: reliability for different design criteria. Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1992; 2033–2038.
8. 8 Makris N, Chang S. Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000 ; 29: 85–107.
9. 9 Kelly JM. The influence of base isolation on the seismic response of light secondary equipment. Report to Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI NP‐2919, Project 810‐8, 1983.
10. 10 Caughey TK, Dienes JK. Analysis of a nonlinear first order system with a white noise input. Journal of Applied Physics 1961 ; 32: 2476–2479.
11. 11 Constantinou M, Tadjbakhsh I. The optimum design of a base isolation system with frictional elements. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1984 ; 12: 203–214.
12. 12 Sewell RT, Cornell CA, Toro GR, McGuire RK, Kassawara RP, Sing A. Factors influencing equipment response in linear and nonlinear structures. Transactions of 9th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, vol. K2, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1989 ; 849–856.
13. 13 Oden JT, Martins JAC. Models and computational methods for dynamic friction phenomena. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1985 ; 52: 527–634.
14. 14 Wolf ED, Constantinou M. Experimental study of seismic isolation systems with emphasis on secondary system response and verification of accuracy of dynamic response history analysis methods. Report No. MCEER‐04‐0001, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, 2004.