Clinical practice guidelines: A case study of combining OWL-S, OWL, and SWRL

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 247-255

  Casteleiro, Mercedes Argüello ^a   Des Diz, Jose Julio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Hospital Comarcal Dr Julian Garcia   (Spain)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Ontology; Semantic Web rule language; Semantic Web services

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DECISION MAKING; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB;

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SEMANTIC WEB RULE LANGUAGE;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 40249088914     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ajax, http://adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php.
2. Schreiber A., Akkermans H., Anjewierden A.A., Hoog R., Shadbolt N.R., Van de Velde W., and Wielinga B. Engineering and Managing Knowledge. The CommonKADS Methodology (1999), The MIT Press
3. McCray A.T., and Nelson S.J. The representation of meaning in the UMLS. Meth Inform Med 34 (1995) 193-201
4. Chandrasekaran B., Josephson J.R., and Benjamins V.R. What are ontologies, and why do we need them?. IEEE Intelligent Systems Jan/Feb (1999) 20-26
5. Medjahed B., and Bouguettaya A. A multilevel composability model for semantic Web services. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 7 (2005) 954-968
6. Zong C., Perl Y., Halper M., Geller J., and Huanying G. Partitioning the UMLS semantic network. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 6 2 (2002) 102-108
7. D. Martin, M. Paolucci, S. McIlraith, M. Burstein, D. McDermott, D. McGuinness, B. Parsia, T. Payne, M. Sabou, M. Solanki, N. Srinivasan, K. Sycara, Bringing semantics to Web services: The OWL-S approach. Semantic Web services and Web process composition, in: Proc. SWSWPC 2004 USA, San Diego, 2004.
8. Dublin Core, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
9. Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.F., Bechhofer S., and Tsarkov D. OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. Journal of Web Semantics 3 1 (2005) 23-40
10. In: Davies J., Fensel D., and van Harmelen F. (Eds). Towards the Semantic Web: Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management (2002), Wiley
11. M. Erdmann, R. Studer, Ontologies as conceptual models for XML documents, in: Proc. KAW'99 Canada, Banff, 1999.
12. Field M., and Lohr K.N. Attributes of good practice guidelines. In: Field M., and Lohr K.N. (Eds). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program (1990), National Academy Press, USA, Washington, DC 53-77
13. M. Hori, J. Euzenat, P.F. Patel-Schneider, OWL web ontology language XML presentation syntax, W3C Note, 2003. Available from: .
14. OWL, http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/.
15. Protégé, http://protege.stanford.edu/.
16. McIlraith S., Song T., and Zeng H. Semantic Web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on the Semantic Web 16 (2001) 46-53
17. SOAP, http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/.
18. SWRC ontology, http://ontoware.org/projects/swrc/.
19. SWRL, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/.
20. UMLS, http://umlsinfo.nlm.nih.gov.
21. WS-BPEL, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-bpel/.
22. WSDL, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20.
23. WSML, http://www.wsmo.org/wsml/wsml-syntax.
24. XSLT stylesheet, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-xmlsyntax/owlxml2rdf.xsl.