Greenhouse gas emissions trading among Pacific Rim countries: An analysis of policies to bring developing countries to the bargaining table

Energy Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1420-1429

  Rose, Adam ^a   Wei, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cap and trade for greenhouse gas mitigation; Economics of climate policy; International cooperation

Indexed keywords

COST REDUCTION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ECONOMICS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EMISSION TRADING; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION;

ENERGY POLICY;

DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; KYOTO PROTOCOL; LOCAL PARTICIPATION;

NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC OCEAN; PACIFIC RIM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 40149107850     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arizona Climate Change Advisory Group (AZCCAG), 2006. Arizona Climate Change Action Plan 〈http://www.azclimatechange.gov/download/O40F9347.pdf〉.
2. Barrett, S., Grubb, M., Roland, K., Rose, A., Sandor, R., Tietenberg, T., 1992. Combating Global Warming: A Global System of Tradable Carbon Emission Entitlements. UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland.
3. China Daily, 2007. Climate Fund Seeks to Create a Green China 〈http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-02/12/content_807247.htm〉.
4. Collamer N., and Rose A. The changing role of transactions costs in the evolution of joint implementation. International Environmental Affairs 9 4 (1997) 274-288
5. Edmonds J., Wise M., and Barns D. Carbon coalitions: the cost and effectiveness of energy agreements to alter trajectories of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 23 (1995) 309-335
6. EIA, 2006. International Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Population Tables 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/contents.html〉.
7. EIA, 2007. International Energy Outlook 2007 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html〉.
8. 2 Emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 40, Cambridge, MA.
9. Ellerman A.D., and Buchner B. The European Union emissions trading scheme: origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1 1 (2007) 66-87
10. Ellerman D.A., Joskow P.L., Schmalensee R., Montero J., and Bailey E.M. Markets for Clean Air: The US Acid Rain Program (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
11. Halsnaes K., Mackenzie G.A., Swisher J.N., and Villavicencio A. Comparable assessment of national GHG abatement costs. Energy Policy 22 11 (1994) 925-934
12. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007. The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 〈http://www.ipcc.ch/〉.
13. Kousky C., and Schneider S.H. Global climate policy: will Cities lead the way?. Climate Policy 3 (2003) 359-372
14. Loeschel A., and Zhang Z.X. The economic and environmental implications of the US repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the subsequent deals in Bonn and Marrakech. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138 4 (2002) 711-746
15. 2 abatement and sequestration potentials for Chile. Energy Policy 29 8 (2001) 631-640
16. New Mexico Climate Change Advisory Group (NMCCAG), 2006. New Mexico Climate Change Action Plan 〈http://www.nmclimatechange.us/ewebeditpro/items/O117F10150.pdf〉.
17. Oxley, A., Macmillan, S., 2004. The Kyoto Protocol and the APEC Economies. Australia APEC Study Center, Melbourne, Australia.
18. Peterson T.D., and Rose A. Reducing conflicts between climate policy and energy policy in the US: the important role of the states. Energy Policy 34 5 (2006) 619-631
19. Rose, A., 1992. Equity Considerations of Tradable Carbon Emission Entitlements. In: Barrett, S., et al. (Eds.), Combating Global Warming: Study on a Global System of Tradable Carbon Emission Entitlements. U.N. Conference on Trade and Development, New York.
20. Rose A., and Stevens B.K. Will a global warming agreement be fair to developing countries. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 9 2/3 (1998) 157-178
21. Rose A., and Stevens B. An economic analysis of flexible permit trading in the Kyoto Protocol. International Environmental Agreements 1 2 (2001) 219-242
22. Rose A., and Zhang Z.X. Interregional burden-sharing of greenhouse gas mitigation in the United States. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 9 3 (2004) 477-500
23. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., and Wise M. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradable emission permits. Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (1998) 25-51
24. Stevens B., and Rose A. A dynamic analysis of the marketable permits approach to global warming policy: a comparison of spatial and temporal flexibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 1 (2002) 45-69
25. Tietenberg T. The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 3 (2003) 400-419
26. 2 emissions reduction potential in China's iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 35 4 (2007) 2320-2335
27. Washington Post, 2007. Western States Agree to Cut Greenhouse Gases 〈http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/26/AR2007022601321.html〉.
28. Weyant, J. (Ed.), 1999. The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a Multi-Model Evaluation. Energy Journal 20 (Special Issue on the Cost of the Kyoto Protocol).
29. Zhang Z.X. Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv-Review of World Economics 136 3 (2000) 491-521
30. Zhang, Z.X., 2003. Why Has China not Embraced a Global Cap-and-Trade Regime? Working paper available at SSRN (Social Science Research Network): 〈http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008592〉.