A three-arm randomised controlled trial comparing Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist long regimen versus GnRH agonist short regimen versus GnRH antagonist regimen in women with a history of poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment: Poor responders intervention trial (PRINT)

Reproductive Health

Volumn 4, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Sunkara, Sesh K ^a   Coomarasamy, Arri ^a   Khalaf, Yakoub ^a   Braude, Peter ^b  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CETRORELIX; NAFARELIN ACETATE; NOSE SPRAY; PROGESTERONE; RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG MECHANISM; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS; INTERNET; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; NIDATION; OOCYTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY FUNCTION; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 40149102534     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17424755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-12     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Assisted conception following poor ovarian reponse to gonadotrophin stimulation. SD Keay NH Liversedge RS Mathur JM Jenkins, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997 104 5 521 527 9166190 9166190
2. Poor responders: does the protocol make a difference? NG Mahutte A Arici, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002 14 275 281 10.1097/00001703-200206000-00005
3. Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertlization worthwhile? H Lashen W Ledger A Lopez-Bernal D Barlow, Human Reproduction 1999 14 964 969 10.1093/humrep/14.4.964 10221228
4. Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). S Shanbhag L Aucott S Bhattacharya MA Hamilton AR Mc Tavish, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 1 CD004379 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004379.pub 2.
5. Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial. MA Akman HF Erden SB Tosun N Bayazit E Aksoy M Bahceci, Human Reproduction 2001 16 868 870 10.1093/humrep/16.5.868 11331630
6. Prospective evaluation of two stimulation protocols for low responders who were undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. A Weissman J Farhi M Royburt H Nahum M Glezerman D Levran, Fertility & Sterility 2003 79 886 892 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04928-2
7. GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial. LP Cheung PM Lam IH Lok TT Chiu SY Yeung CC Tjer CJ Haines, Human Reproduction 2005 20 616 621 10.1093/humrep/deh668 15608037
8. GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial. R Marci D Caserta V Dolo C Tatone A Pavan M Moscarini, Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005 11 189 193 16168215
9. Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. S Malmusi A La Marca S Giulini S Xella D Tagliasacchi T Marsella A Volpe, Fertility & Sterility 2005 84 402 406 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.139
10. A randomized prospective study of microdose leuprolide versus ganirelix in in vitro fertilization cycles for poor responders. DW Schmidt T Bremner JJ Orris DB Maier CA Benadiva JC Nulsen, Fertility & Sterility 2005 83 1568 1571 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.053
11. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. A standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response. G De Placido A Mollo R Clarizia I Strina S Conforti C Alviggi, Fertility & Sterility 2006 85 247 250 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1280
12. Poor Responders INtervention Trial. http://www.medscinet.com/print