Who gets to decide? the role of institutional logics in shaping stakeholder politics and insurgency

Business and Society Review

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-89

  Mattingly, James E ^a   Hall, Harry T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40149097957     PISSN: 00453609     EISSN: 14678594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00313.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alford, R. R., and Friedland, R. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Andrews, E. L. 1991. “Proposals on genetic technology.” New York Times, February 19, 1991, D1.
3. Argenti, P. 2004. “Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs.” California Management Review 47: 91–116.
4. Beaulieu, S., and Pasquero, J. 2002. “Reintroducing stakeholder dynamics in stakeholder thinking.” In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, and S. Rahman, eds., Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement, (pp. 101–118). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
5. Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A. 2000. “Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.
6. Benson, J. K. 1977. “Organizations: A dialectical view.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 1–21.
7. Buchanan, J. 1975. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Clemens, E. S. 2005. “Two kinds of stuff: The current encounter of social movements and organizations.” In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, and M. N. Zald, eds., Social Movements and Organization Theory, (pp. 351–366). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Collier, G. A. 1994. Basta! Land and the Zapatista Rebellion in Chiapas. Oakland, California: Inst. Food and Development Policy.
10. Dahl, R. A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., and Zald, M. N. 2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Dicum, G., Luttinger, N., and Womack, J. Jr. 1999. Rebellion in Chiapas: An Historical Reader. New York: The New Press.
13. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. “Interest and agency in institutional theory.” In L. G. Zucker, ed., Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
14. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.
15. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. 1991. “Introduction.” In W. W. Powell, and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis, (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Douglas, M. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
17. Dye, T. R., and Ziegler, L. H. 1971. The Irony of Democracy. Belmont, MA: Duxbury Press.
18. Edelman, M. 2001. “Social movements: Changing paradigms and forms of politics.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 285–317.
19. Eichenwald, K., Kolata, G., and Peterson, M. 2001. “Biotechnology food: From the lab to a debacle.” New York Times, January 25, 2001, A1.
20. Estes, R. 1996. Tyranny of the Bottom Line: Why Corporations Make Good People Do Bad Things. San Francisco, CA: Berrett‐Koehler Publishers.
21. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
22. Freeman, R. E., and Evan, W. M. 1988. “Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 337–359.
23. Friedland, R., and Alford, R. R. 1991. “Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions.” In W. W. Powell, and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis, (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Frooman, J. 1999. “Stakeholder influence strategies.” Academy of Management Review 24: 191–205.
25. Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.
26. Harvey, N. 1998. The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27. Hechter, M. 1990. “The emergence of cooperative social institutions.” In M. Hechter, K. Opp, and R. Wippler, eds., Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance, and Effects, (pp. 13–32). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28. Hoffman, A. J. 1997. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press.
29. Holstein, W. 2006. “A conscience of corporations.” New York Times, July 2: Section 3, page 9.
30. Homans, G. C. 1958. “Social behavior as exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 63: 597–606.
31. Jepperson, R. L. 1991. “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism.” In W. W. Powell, and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Johnston, H., and Klandermans, B. 1995. “The cultural analysis of social movements.” In H. Johnston, and B. Klandermans, eds., Social Movements and Culture: Social Movements, Protest, and Contention, (pp. 3–24). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Layton, A. S. 1995. The international context of the U.S. civil rights movement: The dynamics between racial policies and international politics, 1941–1960. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Austin: University of Texas.
34. Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
35. Littlejohn, S. E. 1987. “Competition and cooperation: New trends in issue identification and management at Monsanto and Gulf.” In A. A. Marcus, A. M. Kaufman, and D. R. Beam, eds., Business Strategy and Public Policy, (pp. 43–60). New York: Quorum.
36. Lukes, S. 1979. Power: A Radical View. New York: The MacMillan Press.
37. Manheim, J. B. 2001. The Death of a Thousand Cuts: Corporate Campaigns and the Attack on the Corporation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Mattingly, J. E., and Berman, S. L. 2006. “Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data.” Business and Society 45: 20–46.
39. Mattingly, J. E., and Greening, D. W. 2002. “Public‐interest groups as stakeholders: A ‘stakeholder salience’ explanation of activism.” In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, and S. S. Rahman, eds., Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement, (pp. 267–279). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
40. McAdam, D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. McAdam, D., and Scott, W. R. 2005. “Organizations and movements.” In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, and M. N. Zald, eds., Social Movements and Organization Theory, (pp. 4–40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. 1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes—toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements.” In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, (pp. 1–20). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. McCarthy, J. D. 1996. “Constraints and opportunities in adopting, adapting, and inventing.” In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, (pp. 141–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. McNeil, D. G. 2000. “Protests on new genes and seeds grow more passionate in Europe.” New York Times, March 14, 2000, A1.
45. Meyer, M. W., and Zucker, L. G. 1989. Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
46. Mills, C. W. 1963. “Culture and politics: The fourth epoch.” In I. L. Horowitz, ed., Power, Politics & People: The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills, (pp. 236–246). New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. 1997. “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Academy of Management Review 22: 853–886.
48. Mitroff, I. I. 1983. Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind: Toward a New View of Organizational Policy Making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass Publishers.
49. Nash, J. 1997. “The fiesta of the word: The Zapatista uprising and radical democracy in Mexico.” American Anthropologist 99: 261–274.
50. O’Neill, M. 1992. “Geneticists’ latest discovery: Public fear of ‘Frankenfood.’” New York Times, June 28, 1992, A1.
51. Olson, M. Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Orum, A. M. 1996. “Almost a half‐century of political sociology: Trends in the United States.” Current Sociology 44: 132–151.
53. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
54. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., and Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Preston, L. E., and Post, J. E. 1975. Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
56. Reed, M. 1992. “Introduction.” In M. Reed, and M. Hughes, eds., Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, (pp. 1–16). London: Sage Publications.
57. Ronfeldt, D., Arquilla, J., Fuller, G., and Fuller, M. 1998. The Zapatista Social Netwar in Mexico. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
58. Rowley, T. J., and Berman, S. L. 2000. “A brand new brand of corporate social performance.” Business and Society 39: 397–418.
59. Rowley, T. J., and Moldoveaunu, M. 2003. “When will stakeholder groups act? An interest‐ and identity‐based model of stakeholder group mobilization.” Academy of Management Review 28: 204–219.
60. Scott, W. R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
61. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
62. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., and Caronna, C. A. 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Seo, M. G., and Creed, W. E. D. 2002. “Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective.” Academy of Management Review 27: 222–247.
64. Strauss, A. L. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
65. Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273–286.
66. Useem, M. 1984. The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Vogel, D. 1978. Lobbying the Corporation: Citizen Challenges to Business Authority. New York: Basic Books.
68. Vogel, D. 1996. Kindred Strangers: The Uneasy Relationship between Politics and Business in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69. Whetten, D. A. 1989. “What constitutes a theoretical contribution?” Academy of Management Review 14: 490–495.
70. Zald, M. N. 1970. Power in Organizations. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
71. Zald, M. N., and Berger, M. A. 1978. “Social movements in organizations: Coup d’etat, insurgency, and mass movements.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (4): 823–861.