Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 190-196

  Wikstrom J ^a   Ronne Engstrom E ^a   Gal, G ^a   Enblad, P ^a   Tovi, M ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adults; Aneurysms; CNS; Contrast agents, intravenous; MR angiography; Vascular

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

ANEURYSMS; CONTRAST AGENTS;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; PLATINUM;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VERTEBRAL ARTERY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PLATINUM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VERTEBRAL ARTERY;

EID: 40049108790     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701732940     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243-6.
2. Cloft HJ, Jensen ME, Kallmes DF, Dion JE. Arterial dissections complicating cerebral angiography and cerebrovascular interventions. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:541-5.
3. Katzberg RW. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity. Radiology 1997;204:297-312.
4. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001-8.
5. Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, Masaryk AM, Strother CM. MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:279-86.
6. Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, Vinikoff-Sonier CB, Bertrand P, Domengie F, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuro-radiology 2003;45:818-24.
7. Michardiere R, Bensalem D, Martin D, Baudouin N, Binnert D. Comparison of MRA and angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC. J Neuroradiol 2001;28:75-83.
8. Nome T, Bakke SJ, Nakstad PH. MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. Acta Radiol 2002;43:10-4.
9. Weber W, Yousry TA, Felber SR, Henkes H, Nahser HC, Roer N, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1792-7.
10. Westerlaan HE, van der Vliet AM, Hew JM, Meiners LC, Metzemaekers JD, Mooij JJ, et al. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 2005;47:622-9.
11. Brunereau L, Cottier JP, Sonier CB, Medioni B, Bertrand P, Rouleau P, et al. Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmidetachable coils. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23: 216-23.
12. Kahara VJ, Seppanen SK, Ryymin PS, Mattila P, Kuurne T, Laasonen EM. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maxi-mum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1470-5.
13. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi LS, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 2005;236:204-13.
14. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Gilfeather M, Slossman F, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:971-81.
15. Snidow JJ, Aisen AM, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, Johnson MS, Sawchuk AP, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced and two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995;196:371-8.
16. Wikstrom J, Wasser MN, Pattynama PM, Bonomo L, Hamm B, Del Maschio A, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvic arteries. Invest Radiol 2003;38:504-15.
17. Farb RI, Nag S, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, Marotta TR, Montanera WJ, et al. Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507-15.
18. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Caron S, Taschner CA, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37: 1033-7.
19. Gottschalk S, Gaebel C, Haendler G, Gellissen J, Missler U, Seidel G, et al. Contrast-enhanced intracranial 3D MR angiography (CE-MRA) in assessing arterial stenoses and aneurysms. Rofo 2002; 174:704-13.
20. Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, Breidt D, Feuillet B, Lanoix O, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:744-9.
21. Lowry R. VassarStats. 2007. URL: http://faculty. vassar.edu/lowry/ VassarStats.html.
22. Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Lavini C, Sluzewski M, van Rijn JC, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349-56.
23. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, Higashi M, Iihara K. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1154-7.
24. Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1121-7.