Measuring sustainable accessibility

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2017, 2007, Pages 16-25

  Cheng, Jianquan ^a   Bertolini, Luca ^b   Le Clercq, Frank ^b  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PUBLIC POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

PLANNING PROCESSES; STRATEGY DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE ACCESSIBILITY;

URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 40049106455     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2017-03     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mindali, O., A. Raveh, and I. Salomon. Urban Density and Energy Consumption: A New Look at Old Statistics. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 143-162.
2. May, A. D., A. F. Jopson, and B. Matthews. Research Challenges in Urban Transport Policy. Transport Policy, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 157-164.
3. Bertolini, L., F. le Clercq, and L. Kapoen. Sustainable Accessibility: A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Transport and Land Use PlanMaking: Two Test-Applications in the Netherlands and a Reflection on the Way Forward. Transport Policy, Vol. 12, 2005, pp. 207-220.
4. Horner, M. W. Exploring Metropolitan Accessibility and Urban Structure. Urban Geography, Vol. 25, 2004, pp. 264-284.
5. Handy, S., and K. J. Clifton. Evaluating Neighbourhood Accessibility: Possibilities and Practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol.4, 2001, pp. 67-78.
6. Helling, A. Changing Intra-Metropolitan Accessibility in the US: Evidence from Atlanta. Progress in Planning, Vol. 49, 1998, pp. 55-108.
7. Luo, W., and F. Wang. Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 865-884.
8. Forester, J. Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1989.
9. Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 29, 1997, pp. 1175-1194.
10. Hansen, W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, 1959, pp. 73-76.
11. Breheny, M. J. The Measurement of Spatial Opportunity in Strategic Planning. Regional Studies, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 463-479.
12. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
13. Miller, H. J. Potential Contributions of Spatial Analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T). Geographical Analysis, Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 373-399.
14. van Wee, B., M. Hagoort, and J. A. Annema. Land Use and Transport: Research and Policy Challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 259-271.
15. Kim, H.-M., and M.-P. Kwan. Space-Time Accessibility Measures: A Geo-Computational Algorithm with a Focus on the Feasible Opportunity Set and Possible Activity Duration. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 5,2003, pp. 71-91.
16. Defining Sustainable Transportation. Centre for Sustainable Transportation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2005.
17. Littman, T. Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2005.
18. Schlossberg, M., and E. Shuford. Delineating Public and Participation in PPGIS. URISA Journal, Vol. 16, 2005, pp. 15-26.
19. Bertolini, L., and F. le Clercq. Urban Development Without More Mobility by Car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a Multimodal Urban Design. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, 2003, pp. 575-589.
20. van Ommeren, J. N. Commuting: In Search of Jobs and Residences. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 42, 1997, pp. 402-421.
21. Wachs, M., B. Taylor, N. Levine, et al. The Changing Commute: A Case Study of the Jobs/Housing Relationship Over Time. Urban Studies, Vol. 30, 1993, pp. 1711-1729.
22. van Ham, M., C. H. Mulder, and P. Hooimeijer. Spatial Flexibility in Job Mobility: Macrolevel Opportunities and Microlevel Restrictions. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 33, 2001, pp. 921-940.
23. Dietzel, C., M. Herold, J. J. Hemphil, et al. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in California's Central Valley: Empirical Links to Urban Theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 175-195.
24. Geertman, S., and J. Stillwell. Planning Support Systems in Practice. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.