Complex argumentation in a critical discussion

Argumentation

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 405-419

  Snoeck Henkemans, A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentation structure; Convergent argumentation; Coordinative argumentation; Counterarguments; Indicators; Linked argumentation; Multiple argumentation; Refutations

Indexed keywords

EID: 40049105778     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026390419589     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Conway, D. A.: 1991, 'On the Distinction between Convergent and Linked Arguments', Informal Logic XIII(3), 145-158.
2. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions; A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.
3. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ).
4. Freeman, J. B.: 1992, Dialectics and the Macro structure of Arguments; A Theory of Argument Structure, Foris, Berlin, New York.
5. Govier, T.: 1988, A Practical Study of Argument, Wadsworth, Belmont, Cal.
6. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.: 1992. Analysing Complex Argumentation; The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
7. Thomas, S. N.: 1986, Practical Reasoning in Natural Language, Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs (NJ).
8. Yanal, R. J.: 1991, 'Dependent and Independent Reasons'. Informal Logic XIII(3), 137-144.