A computational implementation and comparison of several intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning algorithms

Medical Physics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1103-1112

  Li, Haisen S ^a   Romeijn, H Edwin ^a,b   Fox, Christopher ^a   Palta, Jatinder R ^a   Dempsey, James F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

2.5D modulation; 3D modulation; DET; Fluence map optimization; IMPT; Pencil beam; Proton therapy; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

3D MODELING; MODULATION; NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION; PHOTONS; PROTON BEAMS; RADIOTHERAPY;

IMPT; MAP OPTIMIZATIONS; PENCIL BEAM; PROTON THERAPY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

PROTON BEAM THERAPY;

ARTICLE; DOSE CALCULATION; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON THERAPY; RADIATION BEAM; RADIATION DOSE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING; X RAY;

EID: 40049105420     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.2836954     Document Type: Article

References (11)