Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: Implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review

Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 163-174

  Sadok, Walid ^a   Angevin, Frédérique ^b   Bergez, Jacques Éric ^c   Bockstaller, Christian ^d   Colomb, Bruno ^c   Guichard, Laurence ^a   Reau, Raymond ^a   Doré, Thierry ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b INRA   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Cropping system; Decision rules; Multi criteria decision aid; Outranking qualitative methods; Qualitative information; Sustainability assessment

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROPPING PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS;

EID: 40049090347     PISSN: 17740746     EISSN: 17730155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2007043     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Alphonce C.B. (1997) Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries, Agr. Syst. 53, 97-112.
2. Andreoli M., Tellarini V. (2000) Farm sustainability evaluation: methodology and practice, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 43-52.
3. Arondel C., Girardin P. (2000) Sorting cropping systems on the basis of their impact on groundwater quality, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 127, 467-482.
4. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., Marui H., Kanno T. (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications, Eng. Geol. 81, 432-445.
5. Baker D., Bridges D., Hunter R., Johnson G., Krupa J., Murphy J., Sorenson K. (2002) Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods, WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA.
6. Bana e Costa C.A., Vansnick J.C. (1997) Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 6, 107-114.
7. Bohanec M., Džeroski S., Žnidaršiè M., Messean A., Scatasta S., Wesseler J. (2004) Multi-attribute modelling of economic and ecological impact of cropping systems, Informatica (Ljubljana, Slovenia) 28, 387-392.
8. Bontkes T.S., van Keulen H. (2003) Modelling the dynamics of agricultural development at farm and regional level, Agr. Syst. 76, 379-396.
9. Bouyssou D., Perny P., Pirlot M., Tsoukias A., Vincke P. (1993) A manifesto for the new MCDA era, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 2, 125-127.
10. Bouyssou D., Marchant T., Pirlot M., Perny P., Tsoukiàs A., Vincke P. (2000) Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective, Kluwer Academic, Boston, London, Dordrecht.
11. Bouyssou D., Marchant T., Pirlot M., Tsoukias A., Vincke P. (2006) Evaluation decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst, Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York.
12. Brans J.P. (1982) L'ingénierie de la décision ; Élaboration d'instruments d'aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE, in: Nadeau R., Landry M. (Eds.), L'aide à la décision : Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir, Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, pp. 183-213.
13. Brewka G. (2006) Answer Sets and Qualitative Optimization, Logic Jnl. IGPL 14, 413-433.
14. Brunner N., Starkl M. (2004) Decision aid systems for evaluating sustainability: a critical survey, Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 24, 441-469.
15. Cerdan O., Souchère V., Lecomte V., Couturier A., Le Bissonnais Y. (2002) Incorporating soil surface crusting processes in an expert-based runoff and erosion model STREAM (Sealing Transfer Runoff Erosion Agricultural Modification), Catena 46, 189-205.
16. Chen S.J., Hwang C.L. (1992) Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
17. Crist P.J., Kohley T.W., Oakleaf J. (2000) Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool, Landscape Ecol. 15, 47-62.
18. de Keyser W., Peters P. (1994) ARGUS - a new multiple criteria method based on the general idea of outranking, in: Paruccini M. (Ed.), Applying multiple criteria aid for decision to environmental management, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 263-278.
19. den Biggelaar C., Suvedi M. (2000) Farmers' definitions, goals, and bottlenecks of sustainable agriculture in the North-Central Region, Agr. Hum. Val. 17, 347-358.
20. Dent J.B., Edward-Jones G., McGregor M.J. (1995) Simulation of ecological, social, and economic factors in agricultural systems, Agr. Syst. 49, 337-351.
21. Dias L.C., Tsoukiàs A. (2003) On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding, in: Henggeler Antunes C.A., Figueira J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 57th Meeting of the EURO MCDA Working Group, University of Tuscia, Italy.
22. Dogliotti S., Rossing W.A.H., Van Ittersum M.K. (2004) Systematic design and evaluation of crop rotations enhancing soil conservation, soil fertility and farm income: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay, Agr. Syst. 80, 277-302.
23. Dogliotti S., Van Ittersum M.K., Rossing W.A.H. (2005) A method for exploring sustainable development options at farm scale: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay, Agric. Syst. 86, 29-51.
24. Duke J., Aull-Hyde R. (2002) Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process, Ecol. Econ. 42, 131-145.
25. Ertugrul Karsak E. (2004) Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment, Int. J. Prod. Res. 42, 3957-3974.
26. European Commission (2005) Impact assessment Guidelines, 15th of June 2005 with March 2006 Update, SEC (2005) 791.
27. Ferraro D.O., Ghersa C.M., Sznaider G.A. (2003) Evaluation of environmental impact indicators using fuzzy logic to assess the mixed cropping systems of the Inland pampa, Argentina, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 96, 1-18.
28. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. (2005) (Eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. French S. (1988) Decision Theory: an Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
30. Gafsi M., Legagneux B., Nguyen G., Robin P. (2006) Towards sustainable farming systems: Effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture, Agr. Syst. 90, 226-242.
31. Goodwin P., Wright G. (1998) Decision Analysis for Management Judgement, second edition, John Wiley, Chichester.
32. Greco S., Matarazzo B. (2005) Decision rule approach, in: Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Guitouni A., Martel J.M. (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109, 501-521.
34. Hansen J.W. (1996) Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agr. Syst. 50, 117-143.
35. Hayashi K. (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122, 486-500.
36. Hengsdijk H., Van Ittersum M.K. (2002) A goal-oriented approach to identify and engineer land use systems, Agr. Syst. 71, 231-247.
37. Herath G. (2004) Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process, J. Environ. Manage. 70, 263-273.
38. Hermanides G., Nijkamp P. (1997) Multicriteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural land use: a case of Lesvos, Research Memorandum 1997-5. Free University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
39. Hwang C.L., Yoon K.L. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
40. Ikerd J.E. (1993) The need for a systems approach to sustainable agriculture, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 46, 147-160.
41. Jelassi M.T.J., Ozemoy V.M. (1988) A framework for building an expert system for MCDM models selection, in: Lockett A.G., Islei G. (Eds.), Improving Decision Making in Organzations, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 553-562.
42. Kangas J., Kangas A., Leskinen P., Pykäläinen J. (2001)MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 10, 257-271.
43. Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Performances and Value Trade-Offs, Wiley, New York.
44. Kim T.L., Wiggins L., Wright J. (1990) (Eds.) Expert Systems: Applications to Urban Planning, Springer-Verlag, New York.
45. Kropff M.J., Bouma J., Jones J.W. (2001) Systems approaches for the design of sustainable agro-ecosystems, Agr. Syst. 70, 369-393.
46. Kruseman G., Ruben R., Kuyvenhoven A. (1996) Analytical framework for disentangling the concept of sustainable land use, Agr. Syst. 50, 191-207.
47. Leclerc J.P. (1984) Propositions d'extension de la notion de dominance en présence de relations d'ordre sur les pseudo-critères: MELCHIOR, Math. Social Sci. 8, 45-61.
48. Loyce Ch., Rellier J.P., Meynard J.M. (2002a) Management planning for winter wheat with multiple objectives (1): the BETHA system, Agr. Syst. 72, 9-31.
49. Loyce Ch., Rellier J.P., Meynard J.M. (2002b) Management planning for winter wheat with multiple objectives (2): ethanol-wheat production, Agr. Syst. 72, 33-57.
50. Ma L. (2006) Knowledge Representation Under Inherent Uncertainty in a Multi-Agent System for Land Use Planning, Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 164 p.
51. MacCrimmon K.R. (1973) An overview of multiple objective decision making, in: Cochran J.L., Zeleny M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
52. Macharis C., Springael J., De Brucker K., Verbeke A. (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153, 307-317.
53. Martinez-Alier J., Munda G., O'Neill J. (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics, Ecol. Econ. 26, 277-286.
54. Maystre L.Y., Pictet J., Simos J. (1994) (Eds.) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.
55. Mazzetto F., Bonera R. (2003) MEACROS: a tool for multi-criteria evaluation of alternative cropping systems, Eur. J. Agron. 18, 379-387.
56. Meyer-Aurich A. (2005) Economic and environmental analysis of sustainable farming practices - a Bavarian case study, Agr. Syst. 86, 190-206.
57. Moffett A., Sarkar S. (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations, Diversity Distributions 12, 125-137.
58. Munda G., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. (1994) Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management, Ecol. Econ. 10, 97-112.
59. Munda G., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. (1995) Qualitative multicriteria methods for fuzzy evaluation problems: An illustration of economic-ecological evaluation, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 82, 79-97.
60. Munda G. (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development, in: Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York.
61. Neher D. (1992) Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems, Definition and measurement, J. Sustain. Agr. 2, 51-61.
62. Nijkamp P., Rietveld P., Voogd H. (1990) Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
63. Nijkamp P., Vindigni G. (1998) Integrated Multicriteria Evaluation Methods for Sustainable Agricultural Policy Analysis, Riv. Econom. Agr. 1-2, 9-40.
64. O'Neill J. (1997) Value pluralism, incommensurability and institutions, in: Foster J. (Ed.), Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World, Routledge, London, pp. 75-88.
65. Pacini C., Wossink A., Giesen G., Vazzana C., Huirne R. (2003) Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 95, 273-288.
66. Paelinck J.H.P. (1978) Qualifex, a flexible multiple criteriamethod, Econ. Lett. 1, 193-197.
67. Pannell D.J., Schilizzi S. (1999) Sustainable agriculture: a question of ecology, equity, economic efficiency or expedience? J. Sustain. Agr. 13, 57-66.
68. Park J., Seaton R.A.F. (1996) Integrative research and sustainable agriculture, Agr. Syst. 50, 81-100.
69. Pawlak Z. (1991) Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
70. Phillis Y.A., Andriantiatsaholiniaina L.A. (2001) Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic, Ecol. Econ. 37, 435-456.
71. Pillai C.R.S., Raju K.S. (1996) Ranking irrigation management alternatives by multicriterion analysis, Int. J.Water Resour. Dev. 12, 329-345.
72. Rehman T., Romero C. (1993) The application of the MCDM paradigm to the management of agricultural systems: some basic considerations, Agr. Syst. 41, 239-255.
73. Rigby D., Caceres D. (2001) Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems, Agr. Syst. 68, 21-40.
74. Rogers M., Bruen M, (1998) Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107, 542-551.
75. Rossing W.A.H., Meynard J.M., Van Ittersum M.K. (1997) Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: case studies from France and the Netherlands, Eur. J. Agron. 7, 271-283.
76. Roubens M. (1982) Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10, 51-55.
77. Roy B. (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode Électre), Rev. Fr. Informatique Recherche Opérationnelle 8, 57-75.
78. Roy B. (1985) Méthodologie Multicritère d'Aide à la Décision, Economica, Paris.
79. Roy B., Bouyssou D. (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision : Méthodes et cas, Economica, Paris.
80. Saaty T.L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
81. Salminen P., Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R. (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 104, 485-496.
82. Schaller N. (1993) The concept of agricultural sustainability, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 46, 89-97.
83. Schärlig A. (1985) Décider sur plusieurs critères, Panorama de l'aide à la décision multicritère, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne.
84. Schmoldt D.L., Kangas J., Mendoza G.A. (2001) (Eds.), The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
85. Sebillotte M. (1990) Système de culture, un concept opératoire pour les agronomes, in: Combe L., Picard D. (Eds.), Un point sur les systèmes de culture, INRA éditions, Paris, pp. 165-196.
86. Shrestha R.K., Alavalapati J.R.R., Kalmbacher R.S. (2004) Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in South-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method, Agr. Syst. 81, 185-199.
87. Smith C.S., McDonald G.T. (1998) Assessing the sustainability at the planning stage, J. Environ. Manage. 52, 15-37.
88. Steuer R.E. (1986) Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application, Wiley, New York.
89. Stewart T.J., Losa F.B. (2003) Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145, 645-659.
90. Sulser T.B., Duryea M.L., Frolich L.M. (2001) A field practical approach for assessing biophysical sustainability of alternative agricultural systems, Agr. Syst. 68, 113-135.
91. Ten Berge H.F.M., Van Ittersum M.K., Rossing W.A.H., van de Ven G.W.J., Schans J., van de Sanden P.A.C.M. (2000) Farming options for The Netherlands explored by multi-objective modelling, Eur. J. Agron. 13, 263-277.
92. Tixier P., Malezieux E., Dorel M., Bockstaller C., Girardin P. (2007) Rpest- An indicator linked to a crop model to assess the dynamics of the risk of pesticide water pollution: Application to banana-based cropping systems, Eur. J. Agron. 26, 71-81.
93. Tré J.P., Lowenberg-Deboer J. (2005) ex ante economic analysis of alternative mulch-based management systems for sustainable plantain production in Southeastern Nigeria, Agr. Syst. 86, 52-75.
94. UK DTLR (2001) DTLR Multi-Criteria Analysis Manual, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, UK, 145 p.
95. van der Werf H., Zimmer C. (1998) An indicator of pesticide environmental impact based on a fuzzy expert system, Chemosphere 36, 2225-2249.
96. Van Huylenbroeck G., Damasco-Tagarino D. (1998) Analyzing crop choice of Philippine vegetable farmers with multicriteria analysis, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 7, 160-168.
97. Van Ittersum M., Ewert F., Heckelei T., Wery J. , Alkan Olsson J., Andersen E., Bezlepkina I., Brouwer F., Donatelli M., Flichman G., Olsson L., Rizzoli A., van der Wal T., Wien J.E., Wolf J. (2007) Integrated assessment of agricultural systems a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS), Agr. Syst. (in press).
98. Vereijken P. (1997) A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms, Eur. J. Agron. 7, 235-250.
99. Vincke P. (1989) L'aide multicritère à la décision, Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
100. Voogd H. (1983) Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning, Pion, Ltd., London.
101. Wang X., Triantaphyllou E. (2006) Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, in press, available online 14 February 2006.
102. Weersink A., Jeffrey S., Pannell D. (2002) Farm-level modeling for bigger issues, Rev. Agr. Econ. 24, pp. 123-140.
103. Zanakis S.H., Solomon A., Wishart N. Dublish S. (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of selection methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107, 507-529.
104. Zander P., Kächele H. (1999) Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development, Agr. Syst. 59, 311-325.
105. Zhang B., Zhang Y., Chen D., White R.E, Li Y. (2004) A quantitative evaluation system of soil productivity for intensive agriculture in China, Geoderma 123, 319-331.
106. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. (2006) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update, Energy 31, 2604-2622.
107. Zupan B., Bohanec M., Demšar J., Bratko I. (1999) Learning by discovering concept hierarchies, Artif. Intell. 109, 211-242.