Optimization of interactive visual-similarity-based search

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Nguyen, Giang Phuong ^a   Worring, Marcel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Active learning; Interactive search; Similarity based visualization

Indexed keywords

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; DATA VISUALIZATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; VISUAL SERVOING;

ACTIVE LEARNING; CONTENT-BASED SEARCH; INTERACTIVE SEARCH; SIMILARITY BASED VISUALIZATION;

TABU SEARCH;

EID: 40049088833     PISSN: 15516857     EISSN: 15516865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1324287.1324294     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BASSEVILLE, M. 1989. Distance measures for signal processing and pattern recognition. Sig. Process 18, 349-369.
2. BEDERSON, B. 2001. PhotoMesa: A zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, CHI Letters. Vol. 3. 71-80.
3. CHANG, C. AND LIN, C. 2001. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ ~cjlin/libsvm.
4. CHEN, M., CHRISTEL, M., HAUPTMANN, A., AND WACTLAR, H. 2005. Putting active learning into multimedia applications: Dynamic definition and refinement of concept classifiers. In MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, 902-911.
5. CHEN, Y., ZHOU, X., AND HUANG, T. 2001. One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. Vol. 1. 34-37.
6. DUBES, R. 1987. How many clusters are best? - An experiment. Pattern Recog. 20, 6, 645-663.
7. GEUSEBROEK, J., BURGHOUTS, G., AND SMEULDERS, A. 2005. The Amsterdam library of object images. Int. J. Comput. Vision 61, 1, 103-112.
8. GEUSEBROEK, J. M. AND SMEULDERS, A. W. M. 2005. A six-stimulus theory for stochastic texture. Int. J. Comput. Vision 62, 1/2, 7-16.
9. GOSSELIN, P. AND CORD, M. 2004. RETIN AL: An active learning strategy for image category retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing.
10. GUO, G., JAIN, A., MA, W., AND ZHANG, H. 2001. Learning similarity measure for natural image retrieval with relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
11. HEESCH, D. AND RUGER, S. 2004. Three interfaces for content-based access to image collections. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval. 491-499.
12. IVORY, Y. AND HEARST, M. 2001. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33, 4, 470-516.
13. KEIM, D. 2002. Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 7, 1, 100-107.
14. MANEVITZ, L. AND YOUSEF, M. 2004. One-class SVMs for document classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 139-154.
15. MOGHADDAM, B., TIAN, Q., LESH, N., SHEN, C., AND HUANG, T. 2004. Visualization and user-modeling for browsing personal photo libraries. Int. J. Comput. Vision 56, 1-2, 109-130.
16. NAPHADE, M., BASU, S., SMITH, J., LIN, C., AND TSENG, B. 2002. Modeling semantic concepts to support query by keywords in video. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
17. NGUYEN, G. AND WORRING, M. 2005. Similarity based visualization of image collections. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Audio-Visual Content and Information Visualization in Digital Libraries.
18. NGUYEN, H. AND SMEULDERS, A. 2004. Everything gets better all the time, apart from the amount of data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
19. RODDEN, K., BASALAJ, W., SINCLAIR, D., AND WOOD, K. 2001. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 190-197.
20. RUBNER, Y. 1999. Perceptual metrics for database navigation. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
21. RUBNER, Y., PUZICHA, J., TOMASI, C., AND BUHMANN, J. 2001. Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and texture. Comput. Vision Image Understand. J. 84, 1, 25-43.
22. RUI, Y., HUANG, T., AND MEHROTRA, S. 1998. Relevance feedback: A power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Curcuits Video Tech. 8, 5, 644-655.
23. RUMELHART, D. AND ZIPSER, D. 1985. Feature discovery by competitive learning. Cogn. Sci. 9, 75-112.
24. SANTINI, S., GUPTA, A., AND JAIN, R. 2001. Emergent semantics through interaction in image databases. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13, 3, 337-351.
25. SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visual Languages. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 336-343.
26. SMEULDERS, A., WORRING, M., SANTINI, S., GUPTA, A., AND JAIN, R. 2000. Content-based image retrieval at the end of early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. 22, 12, 1349-1380.
27. SNOEK, C., WORRING, M., VAN GEMERT, J., GEUSEBROEK, J., KOELMA, D., NGUYEN, G., DE ROOIJ, O., AND SEINSTRA, F. 2005. Mediamill: Exploring news video archives based on learned semantics. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia (Best Technical Demonstration Award). ACM, New York.
28. SWAIN, M. AND BALLARD, D. 1991. Color indexing. Int. J. Comput. Vision 7, 1, 11-32.
29. TONG, S. AND CHANG, E. 2001. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM Internaltional Conference on Multimedia. Vol. 9. ACM, New York, 107-118.
30. VOORHEES, E. AND HARMAN, D. 2001. Trec-10 proceedings appendix on common evaluation measures. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/ trec10/appendices/measures.pdf.
31. ZHANG, L., LIN, F., AND ZHANG, B. 2001. Support vector machine learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. 721-724.
32. ZHOU, X. AND HUANG, T. 2003. Relevance feedback in image retrieval: A comprehensive overview. Multimed. Syst. 8, 6, 536-544.
33. ZHU, M. 2004. Recall, precision and average precision. http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/stats_navigation/techreports/04WorkingPapers/ 2004-09.pdf.