Prospective investigation into the influence of various stressors on skin impedance

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 67-74

  Winterhalter, Michael ^a   Schiller, Jörg ^a   Münte, Sinika ^a,b   Bund, Michael ^a   Hoy, Ludwig ^a   Weilbach, Christoph ^a   Piepenbrock, Siegfried ^a   Rahe Meyer, Niels ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Skin impedance; Stress measurement

Indexed keywords

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SKIN;

HYDROGEL ELECTRODES; SKIN IMPEDANCE;

ANESTHESIOLOGY;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREATHING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GENDER; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; STIMULUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRESS; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN PHYSIOLOGY; TOUCH; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

EID: 39949084327     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9107-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Selye H. Forty years of stress research: Principal remaining problems and misconceptions. Can Med Assoc J 1976;115:53-56
2. Price E, Korr I. Relationship between Sweat gland activity and electrical resistance of the skin. J Physiol 1957; 10:505-510
3. Bloch V. New aspects of the psychogalvanic or electrodermographic method as a criterion of emotional tensions. Annee Psychol 1952; 52:329-362
4. Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2000; 20:3033-3040
5. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6:215-225
6. Buchel C, Morris J, Dolan R, Friston K. Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron 1998; 20:947-957
7. Mangina CA, Beuzeron-Mangina JH. Direct electrical stimulation of specific human brain structures and bilateral electrodermal activity. Int J Psychophysiol 1996; 22:1-8
8. Oscar-Berman M, Gade A. Electrodermal measures of arousal in humans with cortical or subcortical brain damage. In: Kimmel H ed. The orientating reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1979, pp. 665-676
9. Gjerstad AC, Storm H, Hagen R, Huiku M, Qvigstad E, Raeder J. Comparison of skin conductance with entropy during intubation, titanic stimulation and emergence from general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:8-15
10. Gjerstad AC, Storm H, Hagen R, Huiku M, Qvigstad E, Raeder J. Skin conductance or entropy for detection of non-noxious stimulation during different clinical levels of sedation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:1-7
11. Ledowski T, Bromilow J, Paech MJ, Storm H, Hacking R, Schug SA. Skin conductance monitoring compared with Bispectral Index to assess emergence from total i.v. anaesthesia using propofol and remifentanil. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97:817-821
12. Sato K, Dobson RL. Regional and individual variations in the function of the human eccrine sweat gland. J Invest Dermatol 1970; 54:443-449
13. Grimmes S. Psychogalvanic reflex and changes in electrical parameters of dry skin. Med Biol Eng Comput 1982;20:734-740
14. Grimmes S. Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput 1983; 21:750-755
15. Janitzki A, Föckeler W. A mobile system for signal adaptive data storage-application in physiological measurements. Measurement 1986; 4:82-86
16. Schwilden H, Kochs E, Daunderer M, Jeleazcov Ch, Scheller B, Schneider G, Schuttler J, Schwender D, Stockmanns G, Poppel E. Concurrent recording of AEP, SSEP and EEG parameters during anaesthesia: A factor analysis. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:197-206
17. Rossini PM, Opsomer RJ, Boccasena P. Sudomotor skin responses following nerve and brain stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89:442-446
18. Gutrecht J. A sympathetic skin response. Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:519-524
19. Jörg J, Boucsein W. Die sympathische Hautreaktion (SSR). Klin Neurophysiol 1998; 29:186-197
20. Dudel J. Informationsvermittlung durch elektrische Erregung. In: Schmidt RF, Thews G, Hrsg. Physiologie des Menschen. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995; 26: 20-42
21. Aramaki S, Kira Y, Hirasawa Y. A study of the normal values and habituation phenomenon of sympathetic skin response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76:2-7
22. Sharma K, Romano J, Ayyar D, Rotta F, Facca A, Sanchez-Ramos J. Sympathetic skin response and heart rate variability in patients with Huntington disease. Arch Neurol 1999; 56: 1248-1252
23. Rickles WH Jr, Day JL. Electrodermal activity in non-palmar skin sites. Psychophysiology 1968; 4:421-435
24. Veanbles PH, Sayer E. On the measurement of the level of skin potential. Br J Psychol 1954; 54: 251-260
25. Venables PH, Christie MJ. Electrodermal activity. In Martin I, Veanables PH (eds.) Techniques in psychophysiology. New York: Wiley, 1980
26. Fowles DC, Christie MJ, Edelberg R, Grings WW, Lykken DT, Venables PH. Committee report. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 1981;18:232-239
27. Lykken DT, Venables PH. Direct measurement of skin conductance: A proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology 1971; 8:656-672
28. Eichmeier J. Medizinische Elektronik. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag; 1983
29. Sagberg F. Dependence of EDR recovery times and other electrodermal measures on scale of measurement: A methodological clarification. Psychophysiology 1980; 17:506-509
30. Boucsein W, Hoffmann G. A direct comparison of the skin conductance and skin resistance methods. Psychophysiology 1979;16:66-70
31. Boucsein W, Baltissen R, Euler M. Dependence of skin conductance reactions and skin resistance reactions upon previous level. Psychophysiology 1984; 21:212-218
32. Lidberg L, Wallin G. Sympathetic skin nerve discharges in relation to amplitude of skin response. Psychophysiology 1981;18:268-270
33. Wallin G, Blumberg H, Hynnin P. Intraneural stimulation as a method to study sympathetic function in the human skin. Neurosci Lett 1983; 36:189-194
34. Janitzki AS, Vedder N. Mehrkanal-Hautwiderstandsmessungen. Biomed Technik 1987; 32:98-107
35. Edelberg R. Electrical properties of the skin. In CC Brown (ed). Methods in psychophysiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1967; pp. 1-53
36. Barry RJ. Comparability of EDA effects obtained with constant-current skin resistance and constant-voltage skin conductance methods. Physiol Psychol 1981; 9:325-328
37. Fowles DC, Schneider RE. Effects of epidermal hydration on skin conductance responses and levels. Biol Psychol 1974;2:67-77
38. McAdams ET, Jossinet J, Lackermeier A, Risacher F. Factors affecting electrode-gel-skin interface impedance in electrical impedance tomography. Med Biol Eng Comput 1996; 34:397-408
39. Fowles DC, Schneider RE. Electrolyte medium effects on measurements of palmar skin potential. Psychophysiology 1978; 15:474-482
40. Eisdorfer C, Doerr HO, Follette W. Electrodermal reactivity: An analysis by age and sex. J Human Stress 1980; 6:39-42
41. Krishnamurthy N, Ahamed SM, Vengadesh GS, Balakumar B, Srinivasan V. Influence of respiration on human sympathetic skin response. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 40:350-354
42. Macefield VG, Wallin BG. Respiratory and cardiac modulation of single sympathetic vasoconstrictor and sudomotor neurones to human skin. J Physiol 1999; 516:303-314