Prediction of surface roughness profiles for milled surfaces using an artificial neural network and fractal geometry approach

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 200, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 271-278

  El Sonbaty, I A ^a   Khashaba, U A ^a   Selmy, A I ^a   Ali, A I ^a  

^a Zagazig University ^*  (Egypt)

Author keywords

Depth of cut; Feed; Fractal geometry approach; Milling operation; Neural network; Speed; Surface roughness profile

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; FRACTALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILLING (MACHINING); NEURAL NETWORKS;

FRACTAL GEOMETRY APPROACH; MILLING OPERATION;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 39949083945     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abburi N.R., and Dixit U.S. A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Rob. Comp. Integr. Manuf. 22 (2006) 363-372
2. Bhushan B. Handbook of Micro-Nano Tribology (1999), CRC Press
3. Bhushan B. Modern Tribology Handbook vol. 1 (2001), CRC Press, LIC
4. Demuth H., and Beal M. Neural Network Toolbox User's Guide version 4 (Release 12) (2000), The Mathworks Inc.
5. Erzurumlu T., and Oktem H. Comparison of response surface model with neural network in determining the surface quality of moulded parts. Mater. Des. 28 (2007) 459-465
6. Ezugwu E.O., Fadare D.A., Bonney J., Da Silva R.B., and Sales W.F. Modelling the correlation between cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial neural network. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. Vol. 45 (2005) 1375-1385
7. Hammad A.M., and Issa A.M. Fractal dimension as a measure of roughness of concrete fracture trajectories. J. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1 (1994) 169-177
8. Haykin S. Neural Networks a Comprehensive Foundation (1999), Prentice-Hall Inc.
9. Komvopoulos K. Head-disk interface contact mechanics for ultrahigh density magnetic recording. J. Wear 238 (2000) 1-11
10. Lee S.C., and Ren N. Behavior of elastic-plastic rough surface contacts as affected by surface topography, load, and material hardness. Tribol. Trans. 39 1 (1996) 67-74
11. Lundberg J. Influence of surface roughness on normal-sliding lubrication. Tribol. Int. 28 5 (1995) 317-322
12. Mahrenholtz O., Bontcheva N., and Iankov R. Influence of surface roughness on friction during metal forming processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159 (2005) 9-16
13. Majumdar A., and Bhushan B. Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. J. Tribol. 112 (1990) 205-216
14. Majumdar A., and Tien C.L. Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces. Wear J. 136 (1990) 313-327
15. Priya P., and Ramamoorthy B. The influence of component inclination on surface finish evaluation using digital image processing. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 47 (2007) 570-579
16. Sahoo P., Chowdhury, and Roy S.K. A fractal analysis of adhesive wear at the contact between rough solids. J. Wear 253 (2002) 924-934
17. Selmy A.I., El-Sonbaty I., Shehata F., and Khashaba U.A. Some factors affecting the accuracy of turned parts. Scientific Bulletin of the Faculty of Engineering vol. 24 (2) (1989), Ain Shams University, Egypt pp. 356-368
18. Stark G.A., and Moon K.S. Modeling of surface texture in the peripheral milling process, using neural network, spline, and fractal methods with evidence of Chaos, Trans. of the ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 121 (1999) 251-256
19. Xiao Li B., Rosen G., Naser Amini, and Nilsson Per H. A study on the effect of surface topography on rough friction in roller contact. J. Wear 254 (2003) 1162-1169
20. Zhu H., Ge S., Hung X., Zhang D., and Liu J. Experimental study on the characterization of worn surface topography with characteristic roughness parameter. J. Wear 255 (2003) 309-314